Despotic tyranny ruined my life
I don't know if you caught this one; A-level Modern History students complaining that their final exam was 'too hard' because it contained the question “How far do you agree that Hitler’s role 1933-45 was one of despotic tyranny?”.
Their complaint isn't about it being a badly worded question despite 'despot' and 'tyrant' being somewhat tautologous, but because they actually didn't know what despot or tyrant actually meant. A facebook group to protest about the question ("Despotic tyranny ruined my life") has over 1,600 members which, when you consider that 6,000 people took the exam, suggests that a quarter or more of 18 year old history students - people with a self-declared interest in the subject, who might want to study history at university and then get a job presenting Time Team - have a vocabulary which didn't include what I would consider fairly basic governmental terms for pretty much the entirety of recorded human history.
I can see them now; the massed ranks of students in the exam hall, pens a-quiver and eager of neuron to display their hard-gained knowledge. Then, the words "Turn your papers over now". A rustling fills the room followed by...silence. There, spitefully inserted into an A-Level history question about Hitler, the word 'Despot'. Their formerly gleaming eyes dull into glazed incomprehension. As one, their mouths fall open like so many fish and thin trickles of drool begin to collect in their laps. Once-pristine knuckles sprout thick hair and slip to rest upon the ground.
I'm hardly the sharpest tool in the box (my academic record speaks for itself in its unremitting mediocrity) but if I hadn't known what a Despot was when I was 18, I wouldn't have joined groups to complain about it; I'd've kept it damn quiet. I'd've been embarrassed. Perhaps I'd've thought that this gap in my knowledge was at least in part my own responsibility. I didn't even study History to that level, and I think there was little chance of my being asked about the despotic tyranny of Hydrogen over the periodic table in my Chemistry final.
I know some of you lot out there are teachers - what the devil? Can you shed any light on this for me?
Updated from
cavalorn: Nice to see groups appearing expressing a contrary position.
Their complaint isn't about it being a badly worded question despite 'despot' and 'tyrant' being somewhat tautologous, but because they actually didn't know what despot or tyrant actually meant. A facebook group to protest about the question ("Despotic tyranny ruined my life") has over 1,600 members which, when you consider that 6,000 people took the exam, suggests that a quarter or more of 18 year old history students - people with a self-declared interest in the subject, who might want to study history at university and then get a job presenting Time Team - have a vocabulary which didn't include what I would consider fairly basic governmental terms for pretty much the entirety of recorded human history.
I can see them now; the massed ranks of students in the exam hall, pens a-quiver and eager of neuron to display their hard-gained knowledge. Then, the words "Turn your papers over now". A rustling fills the room followed by...silence. There, spitefully inserted into an A-Level history question about Hitler, the word 'Despot'. Their formerly gleaming eyes dull into glazed incomprehension. As one, their mouths fall open like so many fish and thin trickles of drool begin to collect in their laps. Once-pristine knuckles sprout thick hair and slip to rest upon the ground.
I'm hardly the sharpest tool in the box (my academic record speaks for itself in its unremitting mediocrity) but if I hadn't known what a Despot was when I was 18, I wouldn't have joined groups to complain about it; I'd've kept it damn quiet. I'd've been embarrassed. Perhaps I'd've thought that this gap in my knowledge was at least in part my own responsibility. I didn't even study History to that level, and I think there was little chance of my being asked about the despotic tyranny of Hydrogen over the periodic table in my Chemistry final.
I know some of you lot out there are teachers - what the devil? Can you shed any light on this for me?
Updated from
Anniversaire ruined my life
Basically the problem is these people don't game enough. Gaming leads to all sorts of bizarre knowledge (Traveller taught me political systems, what albedo meant. Star Ace taught me percentages) and a broadened vocabulary (how many vampire players knew what obfuscate meant before Masquerade).
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
(Anonymous) 2009-07-17 09:25 am (UTC)(link)"Another nadir of neophyte DM's is the killer dungeon..."
H
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
Here from Cavalorn's LJ.
And yes - what you said.
Of course, at the age of 12, I had all these words thanks to Gary that I didn't know how to pronounce at all, but I did know what they meant.
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
Re: Anniversaire ruined my life
no subject
I am kinda cringing at the number of people on the group, actually. How can a third of the students who took that exam think that 'despotic' means 'chaotic'? The blurb on that page makes me weep too - 'for our marks to hinge on our understanding of one specialist term is, quite frankly, ridiculous'. How is 'despotic' a specialist term?
God, I hope they do all fail!
no subject
no subject
I wonder if it's an English failing. Students should be reading more perhaps? And maybe more classics and fewer gritty modern reads? Gah! I sound terribly old, don't I?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Oh god, what if they do pass and these are the future history teachers?
no subject
no subject
no subject
Two of my friends work in education (in Australia, but we're getting similar problems here) and both make no bones about the state of the sausage factory. Western education is a Victorian-era model designed to prepare children to work in factories, hence the lining up, the bells, and the emphasis on conformity. Over the years the scope of what's being taught has narrowed quite a bit, and couple that with a culture of It's All About You and immediate satisfaction of every desire and, frankly, a lot of practical experience and education is being missed. Libraries worth for each person. People like Ken Robinson posit alternatives which are worth hearing - alternatives designed for the 21st century rather than the 19th, but I think the damage has been done. At least as far as this generation is concerned. Christ only knows what kind of world we'll be spending our dotage in.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
please god let it be a piss take!
no subject
no subject
:p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
Re: :p
no subject
For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
sorry, but
Re: sorry, but
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-17 16:51 (UTC) - ExpandYou are Brian and I claim my £5
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-21 08:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-17 14:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: For your final paper
Re: For your final paper
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-17 16:41 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Nothing surprises me any more about education. NuLab seem to have completely fucked the educational system.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-07-17 10:55 am (UTC)(link)If education meant money, as opposed to being micromanaged by dorx, I suspect they would rapidly shift their stance. Right now, being ill educated is a smart choice.
no subject
So I'd probably have been wondering what the difference between the two was, considering they'd slung them together like that.
In my defence however I dumped history at year 9 in order to pursue arts, drinking and wistfully pining after the fairer sex.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-17 11:24 (UTC) - Expandno subject
The secondary school and college kids I know have no interest in any of their subject and relentlessly mock anyone who does. It's cool to be ignorant, not interested, better to be funny, boorish and incompetent than intelligent, well-read or eloquent.
Most of my "general knowledge" came from being interested enough in a subject to read around it and still does.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-17 12:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-17 12:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-07-17 12:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
FB sampling is unreliable