I wish people didn't send me these links.

[davywavy]

But as they have I'll give you lot a chance to see them too...

Not work safe. By any stretch of the imagination.

In the name of all that is Holy, whatever you do, don't click here. For that matter, if you click here you'll regret it too. And if you click here, then I don't think you'll thank me either.

Comments

Self Restraint

[ex-boog351.livejournal.com]

You know, I really had to stop myself doing it, but I didn't click on those links. I am soooo strong willed

Re: Self Restraint

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

Whatever you do, don't click on them when your boss is looking over your shoulder. Ever.

Re: Self Restraint

[ex-boog351.livejournal.com]

Stop trying to tempt me. I won't do it. *Breaks into cold sweat*

[chrisvenus]

So what, are they pictures or text or what? I saw some of the urls and the first one mentioning "urethral relocation" made me thing you were right and I wouldn't want to click on them. Not without knowing precisley what is in them anyway. :)

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

They're pictures. Pictures which have burned themselves into my neural cortex until the day I die.

Re:

[chrisvenus]

And the sad thing is that despite what you have said and despite what I have said I am *still* tempted to look. Its true what they say about curiosity killing the cat... :)

[pure-simon.livejournal.com]

Mrow?

*BANG*

*Thud*

[sesquipedality.livejournal.com]

I thought they were fascinating. There are some deeply fucked up people out there. The link on the risks associated with a fetishistic practitioner was also deeply fascinating. Of course, the last one was especially nausea inducing. It's kind of like this book of skin diseases that we have at Amnesty. They make you feel sick, but it's interesting to see what they look like.

[karohemd.livejournal.com]

We have an illustrated medical dictionary (Pschyrembel) at work. Not just drawings but also many, many bad photos, thankfully in b&w but still bad.

[karohemd.livejournal.com]

I agree with Christi here. I have no problems looking at these.
However, the question is, WHY?

I made the mistake

[applez.livejournal.com]

Of clicking the first link at work. I won't bother with the rest until I'm at home.

I'll say this:

1) Please amend your post to say 'I'M NOT BEING IRONIC!!!'

2) After the first pic, I hope you have gained an empathy for kebabs. ;-)

Ah well, the things people do for pleasure.

---

[crocodilewings.livejournal.com]

I've not had a look at these either. I'm good at that sort of thing.

Can I suggest that unless you wish to retain your lunch, and your sanity, you don't look here, for it is most foul.

[crocodilewings.livejournal.com]

And for the general public, that link is not work safe, by any stretch of the imagination.

[crocodilewings.livejournal.com]

And as aside (and a sentence beginning with a weak conjunction), "by any stretch of the imagination" seems to be a remarkably common suffix to "not work safe" these days.

[omentide.livejournal.com]

Although (is that a conjunction?), apart from your inimitable contribution (which I STILL say is faked), it would be perfectly work safe from my point of view.

One new comment

[applez.livejournal.com]

You sick twisted fuck!

As Observer of Things-Most-Foul, you are naturally given the role of Guardian of TMF ... why you do spreadin' the shit around? Damn that shit is nasty!

----