Saturday Night at the Movies
Jan. 11th, 2004 11:08 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1) The Last Samurai is better than Kill Bill, which is probably the most comparable film I've seen this year. I like much about it - the Japanese Asceticism and discipline, 19th century fashion, and head choppy-off fighting with Ninjas, all done better than Tarantino managed, and with more heart too.
Am I the only one who feels Tarantine to be a one-trick pony whose time has passed?
2) Highlander: Endgame is the fourth or fifth sequel to the well-received 1986 original, and further sodomises what moldering remains of the original can be found. Terrible, terrible, terrible. Not 'so bad it's good'. Just bad. You thought Highlander 2: The Quickening was bad? You ain't seen nothin'.
3) Inseminoid. A classic piece of zero-budget early eighties British sci-fi horror, in which a Cheryl-Baker-out-of-Bucks-Fizz lookalike has a nasty encounter with an Alien Vampire with a Cyber-schlong, and her day doesn't improve much after that. So bad it's good. Considerably better than Highlander: Endgame, to be sure.
Am I the only one who feels Tarantine to be a one-trick pony whose time has passed?
2) Highlander: Endgame is the fourth or fifth sequel to the well-received 1986 original, and further sodomises what moldering remains of the original can be found. Terrible, terrible, terrible. Not 'so bad it's good'. Just bad. You thought Highlander 2: The Quickening was bad? You ain't seen nothin'.
3) Inseminoid. A classic piece of zero-budget early eighties British sci-fi horror, in which a Cheryl-Baker-out-of-Bucks-Fizz lookalike has a nasty encounter with an Alien Vampire with a Cyber-schlong, and her day doesn't improve much after that. So bad it's good. Considerably better than Highlander: Endgame, to be sure.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-11 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-11 04:27 pm (UTC)So overall, what did I think? Some good touches, good direction, some wonderful individual scenes but brought down by the excesses of a spoiled director prone to hyperbole. The story of Quentin Tarantino's life it seems.
Overall: 3.5/10
no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 10:33 am (UTC)Interesting
Also: no, you aren't alone. I quite enjoyed Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" back in 1994, was annoyed at the lack of much evolution between that film and "Reservoir Dogs" which I viewed afterwards, and was pretty much put off by Tarantino's lack of range by the point of his direction of an ER episode (though Ewan MacGregor was good in it).
Then, as far as 'Kill Bill' was concerned, you can read my own disappointed review here:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/applez/155333.html
You may find this interesting, btw:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F2081EFE355A0C778CDDA80894DC404482
"Land of the rising cliche"
Re: Interesting
Date: 2004-01-12 10:38 am (UTC)Re: Interesting
Date: 2004-01-12 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 12:21 am (UTC)2. Worse than Highlander 2?! But thats not possible!?!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 05:20 am (UTC)If not worse they were certainly trying to go for a tie. Not only did it not have anything that makes a good film, it also had crappy cheap special effects too.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 12:21 am (UTC)Last Samurai: really very good
Beyond that, all is detail.
How goes the capitalisin'?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 02:57 am (UTC)Totally destroyed the shreads of dignity left after The Quickening and The Sorcerer.
Apparently they are filming number 5 in Iceland starting soon!
I blacked out after the first 10 minutes of Inseminoid, the acting was so bad and the sets were sub Dr Who.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-13 07:08 am (UTC)There Should Have Been Only One!