"Goth girls," he said to me, "are easy."
May. 5th, 2004 12:21 pmThe scene was the bathroom of my house the year after I graduated. As I was primping and preening myself in front of the mirror for an evening of childish debauchery (“Which do you think? The black or the blue lippy?”), my housemate wandered in and gave me the benefit of his opinions regarding women he’d never meet and never have.
What really sticks in my memory is the tone of bitterness he said it in; the angry dismissal as worthless of something that he undoubtedly wanted but could never have. I think it’s human nature to dismiss as pointless things they want but can’t have. It’s cognitive dissonance: I want it but can’t have it, therefore I don’t want it really. In fact I hate it. So ner.
This memory was brought back to me by a conversation I had last night. I think that most men have fantasies about goth-chicks at some level, and the vast majority will never get to indulge. A friend of mine who works in the city says a lot of his besuited associates certainly do, and I once considered setting up a City/Goth dating agency, introducing Goths of my acquaintance to wealthy city men who’d otherwise never get the chance to meet the object of their fantasies outside of fantasy and lapdance clubs - the odd juxtaposition of my social circles serving to my advantage for once.
This serves only to reinforce my theory: ordinary men fantasise about Goths, and now I’m in the position of being a jet-setting global business magnate, I can see a way to turn this to my advantage and make a tidy bundle of loot at the same time. Yes, I’m talking about Porn.
Richard Desmond has gone from being a smut peddler to a respectable man of media, and it seems to me that there’s really no reason I can’t do likewise. Purveying quality one-handed literature to single gentlemen of discernment.
Of course, first I have to think of a winning title: ’Readers Stoves’? No, perhaps not. ’Roleplaying Ravers’? Definitely Not.
Goth Babes.
It has a ring to it, I think.
“Beautiful creatures of the night shown as nature intended.”
“Morticia, 21, likes the colour black and cats. She says her ambition is to meet a fat, bald fortysomething man with a combover and be his sex slave.”
We* could fill the magazine with pictoral depictions of Goths in the altogether, padded out (the magazine, not the goths) with articles (“The Corset throughout history”, and “Black No.1 – the thinking girl's dye?”), and advertisements for Goth-related sex toys, like vibrating Ankhs, your own inflatable Goth (“Do not exceed 250psi. Not to be used as a life preserver”), and battery powered Cthulhu dolls (“He'll get a grip on more than your soul. Now with extra tentacle action!”).
Bearing in mind the above-mentioned goth fantasies, I can’t see this one failing**. Fame and fortune are assured me.
So. Who wants to volunteer to be my first centrefold? We're off to the big time, baby.
* Do you like the way I slipped the word ‘We’ in there? See? Now I’ve involved you in this sordid little fantasy. Don’t you feel faintly soiled?
**To complete the Goth-porn juxtaposition, I shall have to grow a bushy moustache and then put flourescent extensions into it.
What really sticks in my memory is the tone of bitterness he said it in; the angry dismissal as worthless of something that he undoubtedly wanted but could never have. I think it’s human nature to dismiss as pointless things they want but can’t have. It’s cognitive dissonance: I want it but can’t have it, therefore I don’t want it really. In fact I hate it. So ner.
This memory was brought back to me by a conversation I had last night. I think that most men have fantasies about goth-chicks at some level, and the vast majority will never get to indulge. A friend of mine who works in the city says a lot of his besuited associates certainly do, and I once considered setting up a City/Goth dating agency, introducing Goths of my acquaintance to wealthy city men who’d otherwise never get the chance to meet the object of their fantasies outside of fantasy and lapdance clubs - the odd juxtaposition of my social circles serving to my advantage for once.
This serves only to reinforce my theory: ordinary men fantasise about Goths, and now I’m in the position of being a jet-setting global business magnate, I can see a way to turn this to my advantage and make a tidy bundle of loot at the same time. Yes, I’m talking about Porn.
Richard Desmond has gone from being a smut peddler to a respectable man of media, and it seems to me that there’s really no reason I can’t do likewise. Purveying quality one-handed literature to single gentlemen of discernment.
Of course, first I have to think of a winning title: ’Readers Stoves’? No, perhaps not. ’Roleplaying Ravers’? Definitely Not.
Goth Babes.
It has a ring to it, I think.
“Beautiful creatures of the night shown as nature intended.”
“Morticia, 21, likes the colour black and cats. She says her ambition is to meet a fat, bald fortysomething man with a combover and be his sex slave.”
We* could fill the magazine with pictoral depictions of Goths in the altogether, padded out (the magazine, not the goths) with articles (“The Corset throughout history”, and “Black No.1 – the thinking girl's dye?”), and advertisements for Goth-related sex toys, like vibrating Ankhs, your own inflatable Goth (“Do not exceed 250psi. Not to be used as a life preserver”), and battery powered Cthulhu dolls (“He'll get a grip on more than your soul. Now with extra tentacle action!”).
Bearing in mind the above-mentioned goth fantasies, I can’t see this one failing**. Fame and fortune are assured me.
So. Who wants to volunteer to be my first centrefold? We're off to the big time, baby.
* Do you like the way I slipped the word ‘We’ in there? See? Now I’ve involved you in this sordid little fantasy. Don’t you feel faintly soiled?
**To complete the Goth-porn juxtaposition, I shall have to grow a bushy moustache and then put flourescent extensions into it.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:33 am (UTC)I wonder if Gothbabes.com has gone?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:36 am (UTC)However, I was giggling about this idea on the train earlier and just had to share. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:38 am (UTC)OTOH, if you thought the typical goth was a study in the contrast between looks and intelligence ...
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:40 am (UTC)Hmmm, now that is possibly a more original pr0n idea. And I'd pay all of 50p to see it, I reckon!
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 05:56 am (UTC)Evil Overlord Rule # 35
http://www.eviloverlord.com/lists/overlord.html
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 04:54 am (UTC)I'd say it was a top idea :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 05:01 am (UTC)It's always been a joke idea for me.
I have contacts and everything.
the problem i see
Date: 2004-05-05 05:30 am (UTC)so unless you are going to do a lot of poses around graveyards, crypts and the like you could end up with run of the mill smut, and nothing distinctly 'goth babe'......
You cout also try "Rampant RPG Girls, in to all sorts of hot fantasy action....." - as TLA's always sell :-)
Re: the problem i see
Date: 2004-05-05 05:45 am (UTC)It's like goth fashion parades: you can tell instantly which models are actually goths and which ones haven't a clue about it just by how they carry themselves and the clothes.
Fashion shows
Date: 2004-05-05 05:49 am (UTC)Re: Fashion shows
Date: 2004-05-05 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 05:43 am (UTC)This is much too true for comfort.
Yo Pimp-Daddy Dave!
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 10:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 10:44 am (UTC)I know that you claim there's nothing that somebody out there find sexually attractive, but I think that we've found the execpetion that proves the rule right there.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-05 06:20 pm (UTC)A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-05 06:21 pm (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-06 01:11 am (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-06 03:29 pm (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-07 02:41 am (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-08 03:43 am (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-08 01:49 pm (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-09 11:46 am (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-09 12:02 pm (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-09 04:00 pm (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-10 02:10 am (UTC)I've also been writing some Iambic Pentameter, which I may post if I feel confident of a lack of mockery from various corners - not least yours.
Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-10 04:06 am (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-10 04:07 am (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-10 05:12 am (UTC)Re: A prize for you...
Date: 2004-05-10 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-07 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-07 04:54 pm (UTC)Introduce me to them, would you?
Preferably when Jenny isn't there.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-08 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-08 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-08 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 07:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 12:30 pm (UTC)