davywavy: (Default)
[personal profile] davywavy
A year or so ago, I found myself alone in a hotel room with a strange man who was getting changed. I’m not going into how this came about (suffice to say this sort of thing just seems to happen to me), and as the sight of naked man-flesh is abhorrent to me at the best of times I was trying to look anywhere but at him. Difficult to do as the hotel room was small and he was most assuredly not.
It was with an air of mystified chagrin that he told me, as he whipped off his trousers to reveal hindquarters of a pasty luminescence and acreage undreamed of since the night HP Lovecraft ate a whole pound of Camembert, that the lady upon whom he’d set his affections for some reason didn’t want to have sex with him.
As his belly hoved into view the blood fled from my brain and my genitals to my arms and legs as the fight or flight reaction kicked in, in case he decided he wanted to devour me upon the spot. Finally pulling on his clean trousers and heaving them up so the belt buckle sat neatly on top of his gut, he turned to me. “So”, he said. “Wanna go and get something to eat?”

I was reminded of this earlier today when I found myself at a loose end and so in a cinema watching Supersize Me, the tale of one man’s attempt to eat nothing but McDonalds product for an entire month without dying in the process. It’s a harder task than you might assume.
There aren’t many laughs in the film - the biggest chuckle from the audience was at the McDonalds advert screened directly before screening which was an attempt to make themselves look caring and sensitive and concerned about the content (You know, “We’re interested in your comments and thoughts about this film, and please ignore the bit about two thirds in where the bloke’s cock stops working”, that sort of thing).
It starts innocently enough, with a brief background on just Why the subject (Spurgeon) is going to eat nothing but McDonalds for a month, and a selection of medical professionals being wheeled on to pronounce him very, very fit indeed, and to say that they think, during the course of the experiment, he might put on a bit of weight and perhaps feel a bit under the weather.
Naturally, it doesn’t work out like that – within the month, Spurgeon has gained 25lbs, his liver has turned to “fat pate”, he’s suffering from what are plainly addictive cravings, he’s lost muscle mass, he’s getting heart palpitations and, oh yes, his cock has stopped working (this made quite an impression on me, can you tell?). The same medical professionals are wheeled on again to say in increasingly anguished tomes “You’re going to die! What’s happened to your body is obscene!”, and Spurgeon’s vegan girlfriend pops up once or twice initially bemused, and later obviously horrified and distressed at what he is doing to himself.

Yes, it’s propaganda, but it lacks the smug proselytizing of Michael Moore and not once do you want to take Spurgeon outside and punch him repeatedly (another difference to Moore). That said, it's not a film for the squamish. I won’t look away when Leatherface chops up another teenager with a chainsaw, but I will look away when a doctor is telling someone to change their diet – immediately – or risk sudden, imminent death.
A few years ago during the ‘McLibel’ case, McDonalds nutritional experts were forced to concede that the use of the word ‘nutritious’ in their advertising meant nothing more than ‘contains nutrients’. After watching this film, you may not even be convinced they do that.

Date: 2004-09-12 12:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-boog351.livejournal.com
I read about this film a few weeks ago and suffice to say it reinforced my decision never to step in a McHearAttack restaurant again.

Date: 2004-09-12 12:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-boog351.livejournal.com
McHeartAttack, that is

Michael Moore

Date: 2004-09-12 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puddingcat.livejournal.com
I was thinking along similar lines; while I didn't go to see Fahrenheit 9-11 becasue of its one-sided point of view (and the associated knowledge that it would do bad, bad things to by blood pressure), I'm looking forward to Supersize Me.

I can't help wondering how much of my higher tolerance for this lies in my agreement with the basic viewpoint. Would I have gone to see an unashamedly pro-Bush film on 9-11? I don't know. Would I go to see a disinctly biased documentary about the Good ThingsTM that McDonald's does? Almost certainly not.

I think the definition of "smug proselytising" has to take account of the respective points of view of the speaker & listener. But then, I'm sure you know that & simply omitted it for purposes of style :p

Re: Michael Moore

Date: 2004-09-12 01:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Miochael Moore proelytixes, smugly. What winds me up is that I agree with much of what he says (especially in the case of bowling for columbine), but I can't stand his showboating, one-sided presentation of edited facts to support his point of view.
Anyargument is more convincing when it's approached with even a degree of objectivity, which Moore lacks.

Shame, as I used to love TV Nation.

Re: Michael Moore

Date: 2004-09-12 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puddingcat.livejournal.com
Are you saying that this guy was *objective* about his McDonald's thing? I got the opinion he was going in with an agenda worthy of a top politician.

Not objective, but...

Date: 2004-09-12 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
...significantly more honest and balanced than Michael Moore. Offering evidence for his points, that sort of thing.

Re: Not objective, but...

Date: 2004-09-12 01:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puddingcat.livejournal.com
Bloody hell. Evidence in a documentary. Whatever next? Politicians keeping promises?

Re: Not objective, but...

Date: 2004-09-12 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Why, you cynic!

Re: Not objective, but...

Date: 2004-09-12 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puddingcat.livejournal.com
Darn, you're right!

I shall have to make a logical, non-shoe-related comment now, just to keep you on your toes :p

Um.

***tumbleweeds***

I'll get back to you...

Re: Not objective, but...

Date: 2004-09-13 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
In response to this evidence, I'm going to get fat and rich off McDonald's.

Huzzah!

Date: 2004-09-12 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tooth-fairy.livejournal.com
I walk past the McDonalds near work every day and the pasty, obese children inside are enough to put me off.
I used to be addicted to the stuff, makes me gag now

Supersize Me

Date: 2004-09-12 01:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applez.livejournal.com
The non-working winkey ... I rate that equivalent of the smoking's wrinkling effect on the skin for motivating its participants to quit. :-)

Ah vanity ... what a powerful human motivator. :-)

Re: Supersize Me

Date: 2004-09-12 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Smoking is bad for you???? I thought cigarettes had Vitamin C in them!

Re: Supersize Me

Date: 2004-09-12 01:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puddingcat.livejournal.com
Only if you eat them as part of a salad.

As a side note, can I ask...

Date: 2004-09-12 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ukporl.livejournal.com
...that if you ever figure out how you to get into the position of being in a hotel room with a naked man, can you let me know?

Re: As a side note, can I ask...

Date: 2004-09-13 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
And victhe same goes for naked women from you.

Re: As a side note, can I ask...

Date: 2004-09-20 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ukporl.livejournal.com
I know exactly what you do. You say "Hi, I'm Dave, I'm, like, totally gay! Ohmigod! Can you be-LEEVE what Posh was wearing this weekend?! Like, HEL-lo! Prada?! In that shade?! Uh-uh! So...ohmigod! I SO forgot to say: you have like THE best tits in world! Can I see them better?"
Preferably without pausing to take a breath.

And that often works for me.
Well, when I say 'often I mean probably once. So use it sparingly.

Your turn.

Re: As a side note, can I ask...

Date: 2004-09-20 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Right, thanks. I'll try it on the next girl I see...

Michael Moore

Date: 2004-09-13 02:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
I do hate him, so very, very much. The glorious thing about him is his ability to get into the mind of your average American apathetic career creature. Take, for example, my mother; I told her a long time ago about the US using depleted uranium on the tips of its warheads (say about, oh 6 years ago, when I was debating) and she didn't listen. Michael Moore tells her, with all of his fat insufferable smugness and she listens.

I'm finding it amusing now that the same people who Didn't Want To Know during the Clinton presidency now can't understand why their friends and neighbors Don't Want To Know now. Muppets.

I'm looking forward to Supersize Me, did you see their full page spread in the Guardian on Saturday a few weeks back? I just about tinkled I thought it was so funny.
Page generated Feb. 26th, 2026 12:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios