Page Summary
ketchgirl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lanfykins.livejournal.com - (no subject)
omentide.livejournal.com - (no subject)
vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ukmonty.livejournal.com - Secret Ballot Dear Boy.....
karohemd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mooncadet.livejournal.com - (no subject)
the-maenad.livejournal.com - (no subject)
raggedyman.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tooth-fairy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hiromasaki.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cloudwoman13.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sherbetsaucers.livejournal.com - (no subject)
raggedhalo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:25 pm (UTC)Indeed I have! Unfortunately I had a postal vote so I am sure TB will use it to his nefarious ends :(
no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:30 pm (UTC)Voting for his little minions is just as bad.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:43 pm (UTC)I don't believe in presidential type elections. It's not the kind of democracy we have here.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 08:52 am (UTC)You may not believe in it, but they do - and they're the ones who matter under the circumstances, don't you agree?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 12:51 pm (UTC)Landowning? Yorkshire doesnt count! Not even the Lancastrians wanted it, they just waltzed in, Killed the Boar and took the throne :)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 11:09 am (UTC)Still, in my seat the vote was a simple choice of 'Not that evil cretin Howard ta very much.' Unfortunately I live in a Tory heartland seat full of the blue rinse brigade, farmers and rugby playing toffs, who'd still vote Tory if they were advocating 'Compulsory recycling of the elderly at 70'.
So a wasted vote, alas.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 11:22 am (UTC)No, I live in George Young's constituency, formerly something on Travel under the previous Tory effort I believe, something he's been very ineffective about as an MP.
Hampshire Nortwest if you want to look it up. Libs did make up some ground though, just nowhere near enough.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 11:23 am (UTC)Be clearer, dear boy, clearer!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 11:25 am (UTC)Then again, I seem to be suffering from some sort of bug so I have an excuse.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 12:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 01:26 pm (UTC)I just think it telling that public sector employers take an average of 19 days off sick a year, and private sector ones take an average of four. The point I've drawn from this in the past is that privatisation is obvously good for the health.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 08:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:46 pm (UTC)I think.
or at least I keep telling him to.
Secret Ballot Dear Boy.....
Date: 2005-05-05 03:52 pm (UTC)So Yah Boo to you!
That and the bastards managed to deregister me from the electoral rolls....
no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-05 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 03:07 am (UTC)It hasn't gotten much play on the US News Channels... or maybe they played something two hours ago and I missed it...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 02:35 pm (UTC)Not true. Actually, voteing for the Labour Candadate here would actually be worse than voteing for Blair who, technically, ocasionally rebels against the party.
This ISN'T a presidential style country, no matter how often people say it is. Blair himself does obviously admire the presidential style system, the number of none-elected advisors he has and also the less esteem he seems to have placed in his cabanate would say otherwise, however, with the STUPID majority Labour have enjoyed Blair could afford to act as he has in the past, infact, why wouldn't he? Now, however, with only 34 MPs needing to rebel Blair will be forced to listen to his back benchers. In the past the Conseratives were no kind of oposition (the infighting was crazy) and the Lib Dems are not really a threat, if indeed they are now. However, thanks to a buitful piece of hatchet work by the Conseratives, and also the euphoria of 1997 now being over, we get back to a more typical government set up.
As to the idea that a party system is deteremental to government, which I feel is implied in the 200 years ago idea, I'm not sure I agree with that either. The MP represents thier constituants. The majority of those constituants should, generally, be for the majority of the things the party that MP represents is for. Ocasionally enough people will contact thier MP saying they are against something or other, and then that MP is, in my opinion, supposed to rebel. This way the country actually gets governed, as the role of parliment itself has changed drematically (the monarch not quite as important as they were and so on) but also the local people get represented.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-06 04:22 pm (UTC)If I still lived in Birmingham Selly Oak, where Lynne Jones is the incumbent Labour MP (and victorious candidate) I might, at a push, have voted for her if it looked like the Tories might take the seat off her. Lynne's a big advocate of student rights and a friend to my SU.
In Birmingham Edgbaston, where I live, however, I would sooner lose a bollock than vote for Gisela Stewart, who is a pussy-whipped bitch to Blair's party line. The Tories could have the damn thing back.
But of course I voted Green anyway. And, hey, we beat UKIP :-D