(no subject)
Mar. 16th, 2006 01:22 pmDavid's first law of political engagement: The influence of your political movement is inversely proportional to the number of jugglers, digeridoos, friendship bracelets and enormous felt jester hats amongst your membership.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 01:59 pm (UTC)Dude, I was totally lied to by Iain M Banks
Date: 2006-03-16 02:10 pm (UTC)H
no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 02:33 pm (UTC)Does that mean that the Conservatives are going to hire thousands ofn street entertainers to follow around Labour Party Candidates next election?
Maybe they could win that way?
Or because THEY hired them, do they get effected?
Put simply- the use of mercenary street entertainers- is the victim or the hire person who gets the negative effect?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-17 08:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-17 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 03:46 pm (UTC)Arguably, it was the jester-hatted masses that brought down Communism. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-16 06:48 pm (UTC)----
On a more serious note: unprecedented numbers of global street protests may have failed to prevent the Iraq war, but have effectively generated the vehicle by which the administration's incompetence is so publically viewed, and have moved it well on the path of political isolation...shockingly quickly, in political terms. Vietnam took a decade for public distrust to build to a change of policy...Iraq is well on its way to halving that time.
I concur
Date: 2006-03-22 01:22 pm (UTC)Re: I concur
Date: 2006-03-22 02:49 pm (UTC)Re: I concur
Date: 2006-03-22 03:37 pm (UTC)