![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A while ago, before the recent local elections, there was a man standing at my nearby railway station canvassing and collecting for one of the myriad lefty splinter parties - something like the Revolutionary Workers Against Top Hat-Wearing Plutocrats Party, a cause which, obviously enough, isn't close to my heart. However, he waved a collecting tin at me and so I tossed a few coins in. This was obviously a rare expecience for him and he beamed at me. "Can we rely on your vote?", he asked.
Biting back a questions along the lines of "If you're a worker, why aren't you at work?" I politely replied that sadly, he couldn't.
"Who will you be voting for?"
"Umm...Conservative. Or Green. Or both if there's a transferrable vote system."
He looked surprised, and asked me why I was giving him money as I was plainly the very top-hatted plutocrat which he so despised.
"Well, I believe that strong opposition to any incumbent power is essential for healthy democracy and so I think it's a duty to materially support opposing ideologies to which I disagree. In the same way, I'd expect any Socialist who believed in Democracy to occasionally make small donations to the Conservative Party."
The expression on his face was worth a couple of quid of anyone's money.
I was reminded of this little exchange this morning, and resolved to do something about it. After all, in order for democracy to function and flourish, it is important to engage politically with not only those viewpoints with which one agrees, but also with those that one disagrees with. Long-term readers might recall I've occasionally written to the Conservatives on points of policy and it sturck me that I ought to write occasionally to the government, too. After recent difficulties, the government would be glad of any show of support, and so this morning I used the 'Contact us' function on their website to write to them.
Dear Sir/Madam.
In the light of the recent cabinet reshuffle, and the accusations of cronyism and sleaze which have followed it, I would like to formally tender my application for the post of Deputy Prime Minister. Having listened to the Today Programme this morning, on which it was outlined that the responsibilities of the John Prescott as DPM are now limited solely to chairing cabinet meetings and 'pushing through policy', I feel that I could admirably fill this post. I have considerable experience in chairing meetings at a senior business level which would stand me in good stead in this role.
Moreover, I am half Mr. Prescott's age and considerably fitter, and so would be able to fulfill his non-ministerial responsibilities of shagging, punching and pie-eating with greater energy than he is able.
As an incentive to encourage you to seriously consider my application for this role, I would not only be willing to accept half of Mr. Prescott's current salary of £133,997 (thus freeing up money to pay for nurses and policemen), but I would also make do with only one grace-and-favour house and one Jaguar. I would also solemnly undertake to have no more than one conjugal partner at any time, irrespective of how this may affect my social life.
I hope that the above application is of interest, and await your response.
Yours, etc.
I'll let you lot know what, if any, reply I get.
And so, a poll:
[Poll #725349]
Biting back a questions along the lines of "If you're a worker, why aren't you at work?" I politely replied that sadly, he couldn't.
"Who will you be voting for?"
"Umm...Conservative. Or Green. Or both if there's a transferrable vote system."
He looked surprised, and asked me why I was giving him money as I was plainly the very top-hatted plutocrat which he so despised.
"Well, I believe that strong opposition to any incumbent power is essential for healthy democracy and so I think it's a duty to materially support opposing ideologies to which I disagree. In the same way, I'd expect any Socialist who believed in Democracy to occasionally make small donations to the Conservative Party."
The expression on his face was worth a couple of quid of anyone's money.
I was reminded of this little exchange this morning, and resolved to do something about it. After all, in order for democracy to function and flourish, it is important to engage politically with not only those viewpoints with which one agrees, but also with those that one disagrees with. Long-term readers might recall I've occasionally written to the Conservatives on points of policy and it sturck me that I ought to write occasionally to the government, too. After recent difficulties, the government would be glad of any show of support, and so this morning I used the 'Contact us' function on their website to write to them.
Dear Sir/Madam.
In the light of the recent cabinet reshuffle, and the accusations of cronyism and sleaze which have followed it, I would like to formally tender my application for the post of Deputy Prime Minister. Having listened to the Today Programme this morning, on which it was outlined that the responsibilities of the John Prescott as DPM are now limited solely to chairing cabinet meetings and 'pushing through policy', I feel that I could admirably fill this post. I have considerable experience in chairing meetings at a senior business level which would stand me in good stead in this role.
Moreover, I am half Mr. Prescott's age and considerably fitter, and so would be able to fulfill his non-ministerial responsibilities of shagging, punching and pie-eating with greater energy than he is able.
As an incentive to encourage you to seriously consider my application for this role, I would not only be willing to accept half of Mr. Prescott's current salary of £133,997 (thus freeing up money to pay for nurses and policemen), but I would also make do with only one grace-and-favour house and one Jaguar. I would also solemnly undertake to have no more than one conjugal partner at any time, irrespective of how this may affect my social life.
I hope that the above application is of interest, and await your response.
Yours, etc.
I'll let you lot know what, if any, reply I get.
And so, a poll:
[Poll #725349]
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:14 am (UTC)* sniggers *
Any man with such a high opinion of his own talents is clearly delusional... :P
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:16 am (UTC)Just because I think you're likely to be worse, doesn't mean I think he's any good.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:26 am (UTC)he's not that hideous you know
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:36 am (UTC)He's a man. A good 99% of them are pretty unattractive, and my idea of attractiveness is not what you'd call normal... But it's a fairly safe bet that he falls into the 99%, along with Prescott and many others.
Besides, does he really expect someone who's never shagged him to compare him favourably than someone ELSE she's never shagged? Fishing for compliments rarely ends in success if you're fishing in my waters.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 08:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:48 am (UTC)Can I just claim that I've done (possibly exceeded, actually) my fair share of "chubby Yorkshireman" & leave it (hurriedly) at that?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:49 am (UTC)In strictly medical terms this doesn't seem improbable.
H
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:17 am (UTC)*feels sick just thinking about it*
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:16 am (UTC)"Have watched every chuck norris movie, can quote enter the dragon at will, master of all 8 forms of sushi eating and black belt in bonsai and origami."
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 10:24 am (UTC)Considering you have no conjugal partners at the moment are you hoping that this will be a perk of the job? If so did you have anyone in mind?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 11:49 am (UTC)That gives me an idea!
Date: 2006-05-09 11:57 am (UTC)It's the new reality TV porn star show!
Re: That gives me an idea!
Date: 2006-05-09 12:20 pm (UTC)Re: That gives me an idea!
Date: 2006-05-09 02:49 pm (UTC)Er, in about six seconds' time.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 03:32 pm (UTC)Actually, now that I think about it, can I take back 'eating pies'?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-09 04:10 pm (UTC)Just how GOOD is prescott in bed?
I mean, can you imagine?
You should.
We all should.
Revulsion is good for the soul.
I feel dirty now.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-10 10:27 pm (UTC)