Art maketh the man
Aug. 29th, 2006 10:30 amA few years ago I was wandering through the Victoria & Albert museum one afternoon. The V&A is a remarkable building - there are numerous little galleries tucked away in unconsidered places with treasures to be found in them and on this particular afternoon I was wandering amongst canvasses of lesser known works of art when I turned a corner and found myself face to face with this famous picture:

It was an odd experience. It's a very famous and popular picture - at university I copped off with at least one dippy pre-raph wannabe gothette with a poster of it hanging on her wall - and the gallery it was hanging in was completely deserted. I could have whipped it out of the frame, stuck it under my coat and taken to my heels before anyone knew any different.
I'd be the first to admit that there's a lot to dislike about living in London. It's full of Southerners, the whole place smells of fresh urine after 11pm on any given evening, it's run by Ken Livingstone and there's alway the lurking fear that some delightful youngster will take a liking to my MP3 player and stab me for it. However, one of the things to like about London is the way it is littered with world-famous art and architecture. You can turn a corner and unexpectedly find yourself confronted with something which you've known from childhood in pictures, freely available for all to enjoy but without the attendant fuss which would be attached if they were to be found in, say, Paris of New York.
Very often, as soon as you get away from the main tourist thoroughfares there will only be you or a very few people there.
So ti was that yesterday afternoon I took a wander around the Wallace Collection. It's something I'd been meaning to do ever since
colonel_maxim told me about it in relation to one of his more outrageous schemes a few years ago. What attracted me was his description of the large collection of European, Persian and Indian arms and armour, and so I didn't realise that there is also an extensive art collection attached which includes a number of lesser known works by people like Reynolds, Gainsborough and Rembrandt, plus the delightfully-named Jan Weenix whose entire oevre appears to have consisted of painting dead rabbits. Not much of a living, but he seems to have gone about it enthusiastically.
And then I turned a corner and unexpectedly found myself in a deserted gallery with this famously cheerful fellow:

And let me tell you - the picture I had on my pencil case at school doesn't do justice to the original. The artist manages to capture the essense of someone whom you're sure would be tremendsouly good and funny company, complete with mischeivous twinkle in his eye.
With that in mind, that's my question to you lot today - what's your favourite random 'find' in the city - something that's famous, but people don't really seem to know about the original?

It was an odd experience. It's a very famous and popular picture - at university I copped off with at least one dippy pre-raph wannabe gothette with a poster of it hanging on her wall - and the gallery it was hanging in was completely deserted. I could have whipped it out of the frame, stuck it under my coat and taken to my heels before anyone knew any different.
I'd be the first to admit that there's a lot to dislike about living in London. It's full of Southerners, the whole place smells of fresh urine after 11pm on any given evening, it's run by Ken Livingstone and there's alway the lurking fear that some delightful youngster will take a liking to my MP3 player and stab me for it. However, one of the things to like about London is the way it is littered with world-famous art and architecture. You can turn a corner and unexpectedly find yourself confronted with something which you've known from childhood in pictures, freely available for all to enjoy but without the attendant fuss which would be attached if they were to be found in, say, Paris of New York.
Very often, as soon as you get away from the main tourist thoroughfares there will only be you or a very few people there.
So ti was that yesterday afternoon I took a wander around the Wallace Collection. It's something I'd been meaning to do ever since
And then I turned a corner and unexpectedly found myself in a deserted gallery with this famously cheerful fellow:
And let me tell you - the picture I had on my pencil case at school doesn't do justice to the original. The artist manages to capture the essense of someone whom you're sure would be tremendsouly good and funny company, complete with mischeivous twinkle in his eye.
With that in mind, that's my question to you lot today - what's your favourite random 'find' in the city - something that's famous, but people don't really seem to know about the original?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 10:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 10:30 am (UTC)Middle temple Hall has to be seen to be believed, as does prince Henry's rooms.
But the best find is Hoare's bank on Chancery Lane. A family run bank that has been ran by the same family since 1672.
Real behind behind real counyters- messengers and doormen wear top hats and there is a museam upstairs! Check it out!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 11:05 am (UTC)I went for an interview at Hoare's...didn't get the job, but it wasn't necessarally have been a bad thing - it would always have been a little difficult when people asked where I worked, since it is pronounced exactly the same as Whores...
Speaking of which
Date: 2006-08-29 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 10:16 am (UTC)H
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 10:26 am (UTC)Art or places or buildings?
Art- well as I said recently Holbines 'The Ambassadors' at the national is an awesome sight to run into... the leonardo sketch is also rightfully awesome. But for overlooked gems... Caravaggio's 'Supper at Emmaus' and van Eyck's 'The Arnolfini Wedding'- so small, so goddamn perfect!
But for awesome unknown art- go to Vicoria Embankment Gardens. There is the Sullivan Memorial (to Sullivan out of Gilbert and Suillivan fame). His GREAT BIG head looks out over the gardens, but leaning against a plinth is a statue of a young girl, quite distraght, weeping... so upset in fact she has torn off most of her clothes.
Having a statue of someone griving beside a memorial is awesome- its a HELL of a statue (some have even said it is the most erotic statue in London).
Buildings? OK- folks go to the church of St. Mary Magdalene in Mortlake (south London). Go to the graveyard there to see the tomb of Sir Richard Burton (the explorer who discovered the nile). It's a stone tomb.
That looks exactly like a victorian explorers field tent. Seriously. Even better there is a ladder at the back, you can climb up and peer in... and there is the coffins of Sir Richard and his beloved wife Isabel together in detah as they were in life! AWESOME!
Borough also has its own wayside shrine- the Madonna on O'Meara steert. SO worth seeing...
There is much much more I suppose. ya know me. I would love to go out and get lost in London...:)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 10:37 am (UTC)Everyone knows that.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 11:50 am (UTC)Off the top of my head, York Minster (and of course Yorvik and the city walls, if you're in York), Fountains Abbey, Bowes Museum, Beamish Museum are all good days out. Fountains Abbey & Beamish have rather more outdoors bits, so may well be best seen before the weather gets too cold.
Those are just a few bits though - there's plenty of things to go and see, you just tend to need a car to get from one to the next.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 12:35 pm (UTC)Not in a hilarious, 'so bad it's good' way, it's just plain mediocre at best.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:13 pm (UTC)HORRIFIED.
Harsh Times is highly recommended.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:52 pm (UTC)Also, John Dee's original scrying crystals, mirrors, engraved wax altar tablets and whatnot, in a tiny cabinet in the galleries of enlightenment in the British Museum. That really gives me a thrill, as do a great many exhibits in the Wellcome collection at the Science Museum. I don't think you can beat the British Museum for finding amazing things in dark corners.
I've also been totally captivated by Heironymous Bosch's ikkle Ecce Homo in the National Gallery since I was tiny. I also have to agree with the commenter above who mentioned Van Eyck's Arnolfini Marriage.
The Cast Court at the V&A is also totally jaw-dropping (the sheer endeavour involved in making a plaster cast of Trajan's Column and then putting it indoors for example), as is the strange collection of original tudor shopfronts hidden behind the gallery shop.
I remember very vividly happening across the London Stone in a tiny alcove across from Cannon Street Station too.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:53 pm (UTC)Mind you, that may be influenced by a surfeit of Peter Ackroyd in my youth!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 05:57 pm (UTC)Which isn't where it ought to be
Date: 2006-08-30 08:30 am (UTC)Also ... have you seen "She Stoops To Conquer"? There's a Whistlejacket joke in that, which must have been topical when the play was written ...
H
Nudge
Date: 2006-08-30 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 10:36 am (UTC)If I get the chance to come across to Londinium any time soon you must accompany me on a trip to StPancras. I've never been and it looks phenominal, I belive it's now possible to tour the Hotel interior. I have wanted to see it ever since reading 'Long Dark Teatime of the Soul'.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 10:39 am (UTC)