Oh no!

[davywavy]

Your ecological footprint test says that if everyone lived like you, we'd need two whole Earths to supply the resources!

[Poll #998043]

Comments

[elbly.livejournal.com]

My real answer is 'kill 3 billion people' - but I just don't have enough time, so I went for the more achievable response... how dull am I?

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

Just start by killing one person at a time and work up from there. You'll be surprised how deasy it gets after a while.

[elbly.livejournal.com]

Oh the ease of it doesn't concern me - it's the time involved.

I mean the number of people you'd have to employ, the planning, the burials/cremations, etc. It's a lot of work! And how are you going to actually do the do?

Sorry, I just don't have the time, I'll just have to cut my emmissions.

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

Yo're planning on burying them? Leaving bodies to rot on the streets is a quick way to speed up the process by the encouraging of disease! Have you no imagination?

[elbly.livejournal.com]

But then I might catch the disease! That's not the plan! I'm ment to live so that I can enjoy my extravegant life style!

[fonnparr.livejournal.com]

Going round and killing 3 billion people is going to raise your travel footprint quite significantly

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

I'll offset by planting trees on every one of their corpses.

[raggedhalo.livejournal.com]

I'll include you in my 3 billion for using offsetting!

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

Come now. Next you'll be suggesting that reintroducing fossil carbon to the atmosphere and expecting biological means to absorb it immediately is completely witless!

[raggedhalo.livejournal.com]

Have you seen Cheat Neutral? It takes the carbon offsetting model and applies it to infidelity! *grin*