More on my lack of a television.

[davywavy]

Eagle-eyed readers might have spotted a post I made the other day which mentioned I didn't own a television. Well, the TV licencing people plainly think I do, because every so often they send me hectoring letters about my not buying a TV licence and threatening dire retribution if I don't.
In the past I've written back to them pointing out that I don't actually own a TV so would they stop contacting me, but as a tactic this obviously hasn't worked because another letter arrived at Davy Towers yesterday suggesting, once again, that any moment now a television inspector might be rolling up at my door and if I don't fancy a hefty fine it would be in my interests to send them a fat cheque right now.
It's the hectoring tone which rankles most - the problem with civil servants is that despite the name of their chosen profession they are neither civil nor servile and this really gets my goat. This, coupled with a presumption of guilt and ignoring my sterling rebuttals of their accusations in the past, means I reckon it's about time to try a new tack.


Dear Mr. XXXXXX

Many thanks for your letter of 18/10/07 which I received today. I would refer you to my correspondence of [dates] 2001, 2002, 2003, 2006 and early 2007 in which I informed the TV licencing authority that I do not own any form of visual broadcast receiving equipment, but the futility of referring your organisation to previous correspondence has now become clear.
You have now been threatening to send an inspector to my address 'soon' for more than six years. I would put it to you that six years after your initial promise is now longer 'soon'. Indeed, I would call it 'tardy', or possibly even 'sluggish', 'unpunctual' or even 'dilatory'. I'm glad I did not take any time off work to wait for your promised inspector, because I would have run out of holiday long before now.
You may be surprised to learn that I have no great desire to be visited by some jobsworth functionary with a peaked cap and bristling moustache (who will undoubtedly rifle my underwear drawers when I'm not looking) to demonstrate that I am in fact telling the truth when I say I haven't got a TV. However, I was prepared to put up with this offensive intrusion if it would get you to leave me alone.
With the receipt of your latest letter, and the non-appearence of your long-promised, never delivered inspector, I have come to a shocking conclusion; it is not I who am the liar, it is you and your agency. This 'television inspector' whom you have threatened me with for years is never coming at all.
With this in mind, I am issuing you the following challenge. If the Inspector whom you have been promising me would be visiting 'soon' for the last six years has not visited me by November 30th, 2007, I shall take this as your personal permission, as a representative of the Television Licencing Authority, for me to go out and buy the biggest, most illegal television I possibly can and watch it until I am blue in the face. Furthermore, I shall take a failure to repond to this as your agreement to indemnify me against any and all fines, fees, charges, costs, forfeits and levys which I might incur resultant to this action.

I must ask that you cease your presumption of guilt against me forthwith and send your inspector - as you have repeatedly promised to do - by the end of next month. They will easily recognise my house. It is the one with the large and shiny new television aerial which I look forward to using after December 1st.

Yours, etc,

Comments

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

I have no problem with the licence fee. Were I to own a telly, I'd happily pay it because the BBC benefits me greatly both directly and through intengibles. However, I don't, and I wish this bunch of little Hitlers would stop assuming I'm a liar when I say that.

[vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com]

I do, but I wonder if it has to do with my inherent American-ness.

I'd rather suffer through tons of ads (all hail Tivo) instead of pay an additional taxes for something like the BBC.

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

It's a cultural difference between the UK and the US - in the states, you get Avogadro's number of shite TV stations as a right, here we get one fairly decent station on TV and radio as a priviledge.
Seems a fair trade.

[vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com]

Eh, we have PBS, which does some decent public broadcasting. And it shows repeats of the decent BBC programs (most of which are from 20 years ago. Says something.)

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

James Naughtie interviewing McBroon is worth a hundred quid a year of anyone's money.

[vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com]

*folds arms*

Only more Boris would make me support the license fee. MORE BORIS, LESS HAZEL BLEARS.

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

I would suggest 'BJTV', but the pervos would assume it was a channel for their special interests.

[vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com]

Boris may accidentally get the attention he deserves!

[(Anonymous)]

Blears exists soley to make Condoleezza Rice look intelligent. Takes some doing, but she manages.

[vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com]

This is a fair point. Though, it has to be said, I'll take the -5 IQ drop on Condie if it means I never have to see Hazel Blears in green with matching eyeshadow ever again.

Horrible it were.

[vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com]

The Guardian failed me.

Her eyeshadow is the same color as her jacket.



:(

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

The Guardian failed me.

I believe that is their new motto.

[(Anonymous)]

Carruthers! My Gun!

[davywavy.livejournal.com]

And Margaret Beckett makes Condoleeza shine. How grim that was.

[(Anonymous)]

Statistically speaking, someone had to be stupider. Why we had to hunt that person down & give her a cabinet post is beyond my comprehension. Someone will be resurrecting Madeleine Albright (& perhaps Timmy Mallet) at this rate.