Let's do the time warp again.
My eye was drawn to this article in the news this morning. I'm sure some of my friends list will be outraged by these relationships, whilst some, like me, will just find it funny.
Thinking about it, if this is all it takes to get paid a fat sum by the press these days, I reckon I could do that. In fact, given that my idea of romance is to use a slightly smaller club, in some ways I already do.
David, who prefers to be called Og, lives in a cave with his girlfriend, "Wum-mann" as she likes to be known.
"Me see David as breadwinner", said Wu-mann. "Me like him bring home big brontosaurus for dinner, then drag me by hair to special cave".
In reply, David (or Og) grunts and scratches himself.
But what do my lady readers think?
Thinking about it, if this is all it takes to get paid a fat sum by the press these days, I reckon I could do that. In fact, given that my idea of romance is to use a slightly smaller club, in some ways I already do.
David, who prefers to be called Og, lives in a cave with his girlfriend, "Wum-mann" as she likes to be known.
"Me see David as breadwinner", said Wu-mann. "Me like him bring home big brontosaurus for dinner, then drag me by hair to special cave".
In reply, David (or Og) grunts and scratches himself.
But what do my lady readers think?
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
http://www.cthulhu-themovie.com/
no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-08-08 09:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-08-08 09:44 am (UTC)(link)H
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2008-08-08 13:06 (UTC) - ExpandMrs. Telf?
Re: Mrs. Telf?
Re: Mrs. Telf?
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
In all that is fair and good, they seem happy, are harming nobody.....live and let live.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2008-08-08 10:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I think your paleoanthropological view is certainly interesting I would like to know your source?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Re: TMI probably :)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-08-08 11:32 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
It's harmless, I suppose. It's just a bit sad that they all apparently believe that in order to live by the values of a certain era (be nice to people, stay at home and do the cooking, or whatever), you also need to dress in the style of that era. I can't see any connection between the two, myself.
Just two words...
Re: Just two words...
Re: Just two words...
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
If you were going to pretend to live in the 1950s, wouldn't it be more fun to go the bohemian beatnik route, daddy-o?!
And the 40s... resistance spy, with gadgets hidden in every lipstick?
The 1930s: ambiguous nightclub singer dressed in a man's tuxedo?
Why bother to go to all that trouble just to live like a boring housewife?! No imagination, some people... ;-)