Run as fast as you can.
Nov. 24th, 2008 10:24 amAbout six months ago, The Guardian ran a series of booklets called "The official British Army fitness programme", which detailed an exercise regime based upon army training. I picked up a copy because I'm always interested in that sort of thing, and one thing which caught my eye was the section on running.
As a form of exercise, I've never been a fan of running. It's painful, repetitive and darned boring and I just plain don't enjoy it, but it was with interest that I looked at one test of fitness based on how fast you can run a mile and a half. A mile and a half?, I thought. That doesn't sound far. That's just once round the park. How hard can that be? and with that in mind, I gave it a go.
Cue what seemed an eternity of panting and wheezing as I hauled my huge, pasty behind round the running track in Battersea Park. I lumbered. I tottered. I staggered. I was overtaken and lapped by graceful, gazelle-like athletes. After an age I finished and checked my time against the chart in the booklet. The times were divided into four categories: excellent, good, average, and poor. My time wasn't even listed. I looked to see what this meant.
You worthless, disgusting vermin! Said the booklet. You honking great chubster! There's only two sorts of soldier come from Yorkshire, David, and that's steers and queers, and I don't even need to ask which you are! By God, when you took your shirt off, I hadn't seen that much white since last time it snowed! Now get down and give me fifty!.
Well, I was slightly nonplussed that they knew my name and I didn't feel that the advice given was as constructive as it might be, but nevertheless I persevered. I started to run. Not obsessively, because I still hate it, but at least I did it.
Finally, after months of painful waddling, I checked my time again. Delightfully, I have managed to raise my standard to 'poor'. I'm so pleased.
As a form of exercise, I've never been a fan of running. It's painful, repetitive and darned boring and I just plain don't enjoy it, but it was with interest that I looked at one test of fitness based on how fast you can run a mile and a half. A mile and a half?, I thought. That doesn't sound far. That's just once round the park. How hard can that be? and with that in mind, I gave it a go.
Cue what seemed an eternity of panting and wheezing as I hauled my huge, pasty behind round the running track in Battersea Park. I lumbered. I tottered. I staggered. I was overtaken and lapped by graceful, gazelle-like athletes. After an age I finished and checked my time against the chart in the booklet. The times were divided into four categories: excellent, good, average, and poor. My time wasn't even listed. I looked to see what this meant.
You worthless, disgusting vermin! Said the booklet. You honking great chubster! There's only two sorts of soldier come from Yorkshire, David, and that's steers and queers, and I don't even need to ask which you are! By God, when you took your shirt off, I hadn't seen that much white since last time it snowed! Now get down and give me fifty!.
Well, I was slightly nonplussed that they knew my name and I didn't feel that the advice given was as constructive as it might be, but nevertheless I persevered. I started to run. Not obsessively, because I still hate it, but at least I did it.
Finally, after months of painful waddling, I checked my time again. Delightfully, I have managed to raise my standard to 'poor'. I'm so pleased.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 10:47 am (UTC)1.5 miles as a group in 15 minutes
then 1.5 miles individual in a max of 10.5minutes.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 10:49 am (UTC)Is that like the BMF people?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 11:09 am (UTC)Poor for whom?
Date: 2008-11-24 12:35 pm (UTC)Re: Poor for whom?
Date: 2008-11-24 12:42 pm (UTC)I was hoping after a few weeks of doing these exervcises I'd be able to run for miles and kill a member of the taliban with my teeth, but it seems it's rather harder than that.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 06:19 pm (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 09:34 am (UTC)They were passed to me by the she-David, who is a raving pinko. I don't read that scurrilous rag!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 11:12 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure those booklets only exist as some sort of propaganda to boost the Army's reputation, anyway. I know people in the army, and they smoke and drink and can't run worth two bob. I'm very suspicious.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 09:47 am (UTC)Now now...
Date: 2008-11-25 02:14 am (UTC)Re: Now now...
Date: 2008-11-25 09:35 am (UTC)Re: Now now...
Date: 2008-11-25 02:37 pm (UTC)Re: Now now...
Date: 2008-11-25 02:43 pm (UTC)Re: Now now...
Date: 2008-11-25 07:32 pm (UTC)The 6th, 44th, 46th & 47th Foot ran at Prestonpans.
The 1st, 3rd, 8th, 13th, 27th, 34th, 36th, 37th and 62nd ran at Falkirk.
The 44th & 48th ran at Monongahela.
The 3rd, 48th and 66th ran at Albuera.
The 33rd (ooo West Riding), 69th & 73rd ran at Quatre Bas.
The 62nd ran at Ferozeshah.
The 58th, the Gordons and the 60th Rifles ran at Majuba Hill.
D
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 10:21 am (UTC)Though the sight of you as a 6' match would be amusing.