davywavy: (Default)
[personal profile] davywavy
It's difficult to know where to start reviewing the latest summer blockbuster to land on our doorsteps, Gi Joe. Watching it wasn't like that time a few years ago when I found myself sitting through Ultraviolet and it slowly dawning upon me that I was watching the worst film I'd ever seen in my life and I was going to be able to write all kinds of funny stuff about it later. Nor was it like sitting through a really good film and being able to come out and say "Wow! That was great! Go and see it, everyone!"
The problem which GI Joe: The rise of Cobra (to give it the full title) has is that it isn't bad. It's isn't good, either. It's just noisily, expensively, mediocre. It's the sort of film where the director proudly proclaims in interview that 'every dollar of the budget is up on screen', and it's only later that you realise this is because they've CGI'd a huge pile of money into shot.
To be fair, it isn't as mediocre as Batman and Robin which I actually managed to forget I'd seen in the two hours between walking out of the cinema and being asked by someone what I'd done that day.

The plot, such as it is, revolves around an evil arms manufacturer & dealer (played by Christopher Eccleston) trying to take over the world and the efforts of a highly-trained, international crack squad of underwear models to stop him. They may actually be soldiers, not models. It's never entirely clear.
Eccleston's plan to take over the world involves the sort of imbecilic planning so loved by James Bond villains everywhere; having just sold some new 'nanobombs' (a hilariously indiscriminate and horrific WMD) to NATO, he then steals them back to hold the world to ransom. Seemingly it never occurred to him simply to build the bombs for himself and just not tell anyone. There then follows an extended special effects/chase sequence through the street of Paris which follows the plot structure of the opening scenes to Team America: World Police so closely that I can only assume it was some sort of big-budget homage. French people and cultural landmarks are bowled aside like ninepins before it all cumulates with the destruction of the Eiffel Tower.
As the leader of the squad says with a ironic but merry twinkle as he surveys the destruction, "The French are very upset", and this pretty much sums up the tone of the film. Thousands of Americans die in tower-related disaster? Catastrophic atrocity! Thousands of French die in similar? Entertaining Megalolz!

Anyway, by this stage we're only a third of the way through the film and you can be assured that there are plenty more special effects and sympathetic script decisions where that came from. The GI Joe team operate out of a base in Egypt (despite this the only Egyptian we ever see is a primitive camel herder who is quickly murdered) and this base is attacked by the villains and explosions happen and there are fights and...oh, you get the picture. There is nothing - nothing - in this film you haven't seen a thousand times before, and often done better. The fight sequences are jump-cut in that deeply irritating way which is so fashionable at the moment, thus rendering the decision to cast two world-class martial artists (as the two ninjas, Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow) completely irrelevant as you never get to see what they can do. Indeed, all the violence in the film (and there's a lot of it - human lives are discarded in a remarkably cavalier fashion by both good and evil alike) is curiously bloodless; even people cut with knives only end up with welts which don't bleed, like they've been attacked with a red permanent marker.
And throughout all of the explosions, special effects, running and shouting, my heart rate didn't shift above resting once. For all the thrills I got out of it, I might as well have been watching a particularly lively wall.

The only really good bit is the costume design. During the dramatic denouement featuring villainous pontificating by the Cobra Commander as his underwater arctic base is destroyed by sinking polar ice (because, you know, the ice cap is made of some of that special non-floating ice) I found myself looking at the screen and thinking; "That's a jolly nice suit. I do wonder who his tailor is."

Which I think says all you need to know.

Date: 2009-08-12 09:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedyman.livejournal.com
how the hell can this not appear in your review?
Image
Edited Date: 2009-08-12 09:53 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-08-12 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Because it's been done before, better, forty years ago:

Date: 2009-08-12 09:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
But Diana Rigg had the advantage of being able to do that thing that actresses do. Oh... thingy. What do you call it? Oh, yes. Acting.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedyman.livejournal.com
But Sienna Miller can act. I've seen her do it!
hurm... let me guess, they thought that leather + guns + glasses was fine but throw in acting and it would scare the kiddies?
Bastards, what a fucking waste :-(

Date: 2009-08-12 10:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
When did she do that? There's a scene in which she did the wobbly-lip & tears look that girls tend to use on me when they want something, but I didn't buy it.

Although Jude Law plainly did. Sucker.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedyman.livejournal.com
yes, what a silly man Jude Law is...

Sorry, still thinking about The Baroness and trying to work out if childhood lustings are better or worse once made flesh.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Don't get me wrong - I'd certainly be willing to get her drunk and take advantage of her, but that doesn't mean I think she's particularly effective in the role.

Which is pretty damning, as the role is one step up from cardboard.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedyman.livejournal.com
hence my comment about them having wasted her.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Yeah, but you still haven't said where you saw her act.
PICS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN

Date: 2009-08-12 11:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnommi.livejournal.com
OH HALLO THAR MRS PEEL

*dribbles*

Date: 2009-08-12 11:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
That's a fine, if inarticulate, summary.

Date: 2009-08-12 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cleosilver.livejournal.com
Mrs Peel, we're needed :)

Date: 2009-08-12 11:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
She certainly is! Ding-dong!

Date: 2009-08-12 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rssefuirosu.livejournal.com
A friend of mine described it as a live-action version of Team America: World Police and I have seen nothing to give contradictory evidence. Quite a shame really, as I have today off and would like to take Kash to the cinema.

Date: 2009-08-12 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Star Trek is pretty good, if it's still on anywhere.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
The she-David recommends Coco Before Chanel, and Kash, being a girl, might like it too.
I would warn you ahead of time. though, that at no point does Coco Chanel engaged in wire-fu with cybernetic ninjas, dress in a hockey mask and machete combo, or punch anyone through a wall.

Date: 2009-08-12 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] twicedead.livejournal.com
So you didn't stay until after the credits then...

Date: 2009-08-12 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Nah, I just watch post-credit sequence on Youtube these days. It saves time.

Date: 2009-08-12 11:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cleosilver.livejournal.com
See it again :)

Date: 2009-08-12 09:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emma7783.livejournal.com
Did the horrible 'black side-kick' stereotype make you feel uncomfortable too? I got the same ('thank god we're not *that* racist anymore') feeling watching that as I do when watching seventies american cop shows and old Disney cartoons full of crows and thick lipped slow men that say 'mammy'...

Date: 2009-08-12 10:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
The thing about the whole network of relationships in the film was that at no point could I bring myself to give even the vaguest toss about any of them, so it didn't impinge on me that much.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emma7783.livejournal.com
I can see that. Character development was obviously not high on the list of goals for the movie :-)
I think I was just uncomfortable that a whole bunch of children were being fed a horribly racist, 'scientists are crazed fiends - never trust one', fairly mysoginistic movie. It was like it was scripted by a Daily Mail reporter.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
The problem that GI Joe has is that comes in the wake of Pirates of the Caribbean, Iron Man and Dark Knight, all of which set the bat for franchise-related summer entertainment pretty high and others now have to compete. GI Joe not only doesn't compete, it tries to make a positive of it's not competing. It's like the thick kid at the back of the class making out that not learning to read is a good thing.

I didn't pick up on the anti-science thing, though - the heroes had the red-headed underwear model who could do sums and stuff as well?

Date: 2009-08-12 10:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emma7783.livejournal.com
Really? The red headed came out with one of the most laughable 'science is unnatural' lines in it. I para-phrase a bit here, 'Science teaches that if something is unquantifiable it isn't real. So as love is unquanifiable I cannot love you Mr Patriot!'. Of course all she needs is a guy to start objectifing her and stop treating her like a scientist and she goes back on her beliefs... It's what all women want afterall.
Then we take our mild mannered patriot, an all american engineer in the army. He walk's in to Dr 'Mindbender's' lab sees nanites and says 'Science! It's so amazing!' and promptly gets entranced by it. He leaves as a twisted deformed evil monster who no longer cares for family or country.
'Duke' and the guys he idolises don't have the first idea about anything scientific and are shown as being a rung above the puny scientists that work for them.

You are totally spot on with your first point. It was a bit of a waste of a movie. I think the only reason I noticed the otherstuff is because I had nothing else to do with my brain while watching it.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
You must admit it was pretty clever of her to infer the existence of a previously unknown language from first principles, when she figured out that Eccleston spoke 'Celtic' rather than Scots Gaelic.

And, being honest here, if I found a hidden lab making mind-controlling drugs out of nanites in Somalia I'd be pretty darn entranced as well.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emma7783.livejournal.com
:-)

That had us laughing for the next few days! What a line 'Maybe the fire command is the Celtish for Fire. Celtish is after all the original language of the Scots!' I was pretty impressed she worked out that he would have used the word for Fire (presumably as in hot & flamey) instead of a more appropriate verb . It was remarkably clever of her.

I'd be more entertained if I found a scientist called Mindbender - what a name! I'd feel bad being a sane scientist with a name like that, like I was letting Mummy & Daddy Mindbender down.

Date: 2009-08-12 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I reckon he went to school in Yorkshire, where having a name with any reference to being a bender in it would be guaranteed to get you enough bullying to tip you over the edge.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-08-12 11:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
There's no laughs, no decent fight scenes, but there's an awful lot of reasonable CGI if that's your thing...?
(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-08-12 11:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Ah, you may be disappointed with Gi Joe then.

Date: 2009-08-12 11:34 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"But you must admit, sir, they do have very smart uniforms."
"Shut up Pike."

H

Date: 2009-08-12 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] twicedead.livejournal.com
Which I think says all you need to know.

And knowing is half the battle.

Date: 2009-08-12 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Having had no interest in the toys, comics or cartoons when I was little, this makes little sense to me.

Date: 2009-08-12 12:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] twicedead.livejournal.com
There are two key GI Joe elements. one relates to the toys "with kung fu grip".

the other rleates to the cartoons where a wise Joe would teach the kids something at the end of each episode, and finish up with "... and knowing is half the battle".

Both were referenced in the movie. And I'm impressed you managed to so compltely capture my feelings about this film... all I thought was "who cares?"

Date: 2009-08-12 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I think the world lost something when cartoons stopped any pretense at educational content. I used to really like the moral homilies at the end of He-Man.

Date: 2009-08-12 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applez.livejournal.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVRBBy65IYQ&feature=related

or the better creepier mashup

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0KnnuWT6AQ&feature=related

Fantastic!

Date: 2009-08-12 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applez.livejournal.com
I'll have to steal that image, if that's okay with you.

Clearly Mr. DavyWavy has never seen the cartoon, because half his complaints are indeed homage. Let's just hope they don't resurrect Serpentor who makes Cobra Commander his bitch, right? Right.

Re: Fantastic!

Date: 2009-08-12 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I must say that spending $100,000,000+ to make a film which only appeals to people who watched a cartoon series in the 1980's doesn't make much sense to me, but then I'm no studio economist.

Re: Fantastic!

Date: 2009-08-12 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applez.livejournal.com
Indeed, there's no accounting for poor taste. ;-)

I suppose we should all count our lucky stars that a vaguely Scottish evildoer, "Destro," doesn't appear in the film, right?

I'm still not sure if I'll bother to see the film.

Re: Fantastic!

Date: 2009-08-12 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I'm not actually sure if you're being sarcastic there or you genuinely don't know who the villain of the piece is.

I wouldn't bother if I were you, though.

Re: Fantastic!

Date: 2009-08-12 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applez.livejournal.com
Nope, I haven't given the trailers enough notice to bother really. I have a stack of books threatening to break my face in the next earthquake that I'm trying to read through to safety.

According to cartoon Lore, there were a series of key villains:

1. Cobra Commander in mirror-mask and bag-head varieties
2. Destro, a chrome-headed Scottish Lord with 80s-furry-fringe fashions.
3. Eventually the genetically-created Serpentor who makes everyone his bitch.
4. The evil girl, kind of goth-cute, actually, with nerd-cred glasses of the era.
5. A pair of telepathic twins who were involved with money-laundering, mostly. They were the corporate face of Cobra.
6. A patch of motorcycle fiends straight off the Mad Max set.

Re: Fantastic!

Date: 2009-08-13 09:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
There are three of those in the film.

Profile

davywavy: (Default)
davywavy

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 10th, 2025 07:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios