davywavy: (Default)
[personal profile] davywavy
A thrilling tale of derring-do and bravery set during the golden age of exploration and adventure. Featuring dinosaurs! Kinda.



In the winter evenings at the Explorers Club, after dinner had been consumed along with a glass or two of port, I would often find myself sitting next to a man named Carstairs. Carstairs wasn’t older than middle aged, but, by God, he had lived. Along one arm he had a scar given him by a lion in the Gambia, and he was missing the bottom half of one ear, shot off (he said) by an Arab jezzail a few miles outside Damascus over the matter of a lady. He was always full of stories; tales of how he had carried a fellow explorer across the pack ice of Baffin Island after their voyage to the arctic had been wrecked, or of fighting off cannibals in the South Seas, or of prospecting for Gold in the California hills. Carstairs was full of tales and I believed every one of them.
One night as we sat in front of a dying fire sharing a late smoke, he leaned forward and banked the glowing embers so his face reflected red in their light and asked me, in a half-joking, half serious way whether I would like to hear the tale of his most unusual and terrifying adventure? Unsure of whether I was being in some way teased I said I would and his face immediately took on a darker complexion, as if memories he did not care to remember had been suddenly called forth by my words. He sat back in his armchair and fiddled with his pipe for a few moments.

“It was like this”, he said. He seemed to be looking at the tobacco he was tamping into his pipe, but I knew he was watching me. “Carruthers and I – you won’t have met Carruthers, the poor fellow – Carruthers and I had been on the trail of a rather odd legend for some months. You see, he’d come across some mention of an old legend in some book of myths or other and, at the drop of a hat, had decided to take a look into it. Carruthers was always a great one for some adventure or expedition or other, and an odd legend was meat to him. He roped me in with his usual wild tales and, well, to cut a long story short we’d taken ship and...well, I shan’t tell you where we took ship to. You might be tempted to follow in our footsteps and that wouldn’t do at all. Some things are best left alone. Well alone. We’ll say it was somewhere in what they call the dark places on the map, where civilised men have only made a few forays, if at all. One of the places where even today, simply anything might lurk.

“We’d arrived and engaged some native bearers and set out roughly northwards, all on the nod from Carruthers who talked to every native we met and stopped at every village, asking after, well, after anything queer, really. And after a while of asking we started to get answers – hints, you know. Dark stories of men who’d gone out and come back...changed. Native hunters and workers who nobody’d seen in a while would return and just throw aside their tools and sit until they starved, or worse go on a rampage trying to destroy as much as they could before they were stopped.

“After some weeks or even months of this there definitely started to show a pattern in the stories we heard around the campfires of innumerable villages told by wise women or old men in fearful, whispering voices. Tales of something in the hills which took men and changed them, of some ancient horror long thought forgotten by the world. So naturally it was to those hills we went."

Here Carstairs stopped and stared into the fire for a long while. I thought for a time of slipping away as he was obviously reliving some dark event from the past, but after a time he looked around and continued.

“Carruthers and I led our group into the hills, and the further we went the more it seemed there was something in the air which affected us, sapping the will and bringing with it a heavy foreboding. The bearers were the first – one by one they were overcome and simply laid down their loads, refusing to take another step forwards until in the end it was just Carruthers and I struggling down defiles and ravines, looking for whatever mystery these hills held. Between us we’d abandoned everything which wasn’t necessary for survival, just water and some shot for hunting and a few other essentials and as the days wore on these grew low. Eventually, wracked by hunger and thirst, we took to exploring a network of caves which seemed promising and, one moonlit night we breached a cave mouth and looked down into a valley. By the silver light we could see a river snaking down the middle of it and lush vegetation down the walls and there was something about the sight which told us that, whatever it was we had been looking for, we had found it. From the trees and bushes came curious grunting and rustles; something unseen was amongst the foliage but our bellies drove us on.

“Carruthers bade me hang back. ‘I’m going to make a run for the waterhole’, he said, indicating a gleam where reflected moonlight shone off water perhaps a hundred yards distant. ‘Dawn is coming, so it is now or never. Hopefully I can fill out canteens before whatever lives in this valley sees me.’ With that, he was away, sidling through the long grass, alert to any danger. As he went in the pink light of early dawn, I became aware that a figure had detached itself from the brush and was moving to incept him.
“What a figure! I can barely describe it. In some lights it might have looked like a man, but a man you might only see in models in some museum of natural history. Squat it was, and shaggy of brow, and from its eyes there gleamed a baleful cunning and hatred. Carruthers saw it too late and before he could react it was upon him, grabbing his arm with one paw. With that, it pulled him close and appeared to speak – I could not hear the words – and then pushed him away, back up the hill towards me. He staggered like a man who has been struck a blow and as he returned I saw he was pale with shock and fear. He sat and gulped, and I could see there were tears of fright in his eyes. ‘What is it?’ I asked. ‘What did it say?’
“Carruthers fixed me with a stare. ‘It said...it said…’
‘Yes?’
‘It said there was to be no access to the waterhole until the current dispute with management was resolved.’
’God’, I said. ‘My God.’
‘Yes’, replied Carruthers. ‘The legends were true. We have found the lost valley of the Trades Unionists.’

“And so it proved. As the sun rose it revealed to us sight which no civilised eyes had ever before beheld. Here and there across the valley there would be a group of them in donkey jackets, grazing on ham and tomato sandwiches around a fire in an old oil drum, whist distantly across the open plain a herd migrated slowly beneath a banner reading “One out, all out” past piles of French sheep which lay blazing in the morning sun. Trades Unionists, those awful, antediluvian creatures, remnants of an age gladly forgotten by the earth and whom nature herself had consigned to history had here, in this forgotten place, somehow survived the end of their era. All that was needed to make the vista complete would have been a lonely pterodactyl winging its way overhead, and I said as much to Carruthers.
‘Grounded by air traffic control industrial action’, he nodded grimly.

“I looked out over the primeval herds. ‘It barely seems possible’, I whispered. ‘Not one of them has a brain larger than a walnut and yet they walk upright.’
Carruthers nodded. ‘To take one back alive...’ he whispered, half to himself. ‘The boon to science would be incredible.’
“I shook my head. ‘Madness, Carruthers. Madness’. I pointed back up the side of the hill to where the cave mouth we had exited mere minutes before was visible. A small group of Trades Unionists had already started to form around it, drawn by some unholy instinct. ‘Look’, I said. ‘They’re already forming a picket to protest that there are no women in our group. We’ll never get past to freedom without being heckled. We have to leave now!’

“But Carruthers was not to be swayed. We argued too long in that hellish place; he determined to capture a Trades Unionist to prove to the world that such horrors had truly once bestridden the Earth, whilst I argued for leaving quickly before it was too late. By the time I had argued him to my way of thinking, the picket line across the cave entry was eight or ten deep and the group had broken out a large tea-urn. Many had brought newborns and toddlers to artificially boost the numbers and they sat in pushchairs looking unhappy and confused.
‘We’ll have to drive them away’, said Carruthers. ‘Look, old man, here’s what we’ll do. I’ll try to draw them off, and you drive off any stragglers with something they fear.’
‘Draw them away? Carruthers, you fool, how will you escape?’
‘Don’t worry about me old man. I’ll capture one and bring it back. Never fear, I’ll get away.’

“And with that, Carruthers was away. He ran like a hare in front of the picket line, opening his wallet and saying, loudly enough to be overheard, ‘Gosh, look at all these subsidies. Whatever can I spend these subsidies on? Heavens above, I’ve simply no idea. If only I could think of somebody to give subsidies to. And there’s so much money here. Heavens.’
“Almost as one, the herd moved after him, giving hooting calls of pleading and entitlement. Only a few remained at the cave entrance, sulkily demanding time-and-a-half and benefits before they would even stand up and walk. With that I leapt to my feet and ran at them, bellowing with all my breath. “Cuts!” I shouted. “Public sector cuts! Lower taxes! One man, one vote!” At this the remaining Union members started and loped away, braying with fear. “Og fear secret ballots!” one cried, and “Me not respect democratic will of wider electorate” another. And so I made my way out of that awful valley which civilisation had forgotten and slowly made my way home. I was found weeks later wandering and delirious by a group of friendly natives who nursed me back to health and some months later I was back here a sadder, wiser man. And Carruthers? I never saw him again.‘
‘Was he lost in that valley of unholy terrors?’, I asked.
‘Lost? No. He captured a trades Unionist and brought it home. Unfortunately it promptly escaped onto the underground and the last I heard, Carruthers was still stuck at Raynes Park waiting for a train which was not running due to staff shortages. The fool. The poor, brave fool.’

The End.

Date: 2010-09-28 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
It is sad that I predicted the twist :-(

Date: 2010-09-28 10:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Well, you just got to start laughing sooner then!

Date: 2010-09-28 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
It's certainly well-written and a good read, but the bare factual inaccuracies and offensive tone took away some of the joy for me. *shrug*

Date: 2010-09-28 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
So you experienced almost exactly what I get reading your posts about market capitalism then? :D

I shall bow and withdraw.

Date: 2010-09-28 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
Perhaps so.

I am probably also unfairly inferring from your comments about a lack of democracy a link to this crap in the media about how Ed Miliband somehow didn't win the Labour election due to union cheating. The entire thing operated exactly the way you'd expect an AV election to go down, and no one complains that a Labour MP's vote is worth approx. 600 times more than an individual party member's*.

Instead it's all "the unions founded the Labour Party! And some of them, who pay a membership fee, get a vote!" which seems absurd.

*: based on there being 258 Labour MPs and this document giving a figure of 166,000 Labour members in 2008 and http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/13/labour-party-record-surge-membership broadly confirming it. Also that the three electoral colleges (Labour MPs, labour members, affiliated unions) are equally weighted.

Date: 2010-09-28 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Ah, not at all, I think the Ed Milliband thing is interesting and I might comment on it, but not what i was referring to.

I was inspired by the RMT refusing a no-strike deal on the underground despite this being a manifesto pledge of Bozzer and, one could reasonably infer, the democratic will of the people.

Date: 2010-09-28 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
A no-strike deal is invalidating a legal right of trade unions and, one could reasonably infer, the democratic will of the people...

I mean, I do see what you're saying, but the RMT negotiators are also elected, with a more specific mandate. Bozzer is absolutely right to push forward with his mandate based on his manifesto, but to expect other people to go "oh, OK then" is, erm, naïve at best. Politics is, as I am repeatedly reminded, the art of the possible.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Of course it's naive to expect the RMT to go along with what the people of London actually want. I never said otherwise. Bob Crow caring what happens to anyone but him & his pals? Not going to happen.

Roll on the automation of the tube network, I say.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
The union exec have an obligation (legal and moral) to abide by the will of their members. If it helps, think of it like a company's responsibility to their shareholders; it's about profit, not anything else. Except in a union, you replace "profit" with "democracy." It isn't what Bob Crow wants - he's just a spokesperson. It's what RMT members want, and of course the RMT should reflect that.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Sorry, but it just doesn't work like that, for several reasons. The responsibility of a company to the shareholders isn't just about maximising short-term profit, although I know you think it is, because that's bad business. The responsibility is to run the company for the benefit of the shareholders, which is by no means the same thing - for example, companies dropping and cancelling dividends during the recession in order to weather the storm. Long term benefit, not short term profit.

On the other hand, the actions of the RMT and the BA strikers (and their leadership who set the tone) is in their short term, not long term interest. The RMT has successfully alienated many to the extent that few would shed any tears to see the Tube automated and the drivers taken out of the equation altogether. Striking because their rise wasn't big enough at a time when people are taking 10 - 20% pay cuts due to Browns fiscal ineptitude is acting for ideological reasons, not moral obligation. Similarly, the BA strikers seemed determined to strengthen their short-term position at the expense of the long-term viability of the organisation they worked for.
There's no long-term thinking here, and to act for short-term advantage by bullying others until you get your way is in no way a moral decision no matter how you dress it up.

"It isn't what Bob Crow wants"
Really? Really.
Blimey, I needed a good laugh.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
A union must run to the benefit of its members, as those members interpret "benefit." I'm certainly not arguing that the strategy in the Tube disputes is great (I'm not privy to it, for one thing) or even that it's working. The union I worked for (or, more accurately, its members) decided that despite an utterly derisory pay "rise" offer, we wouldn't go on strike, for precisely the reasons you articulate. The RMT wouldn't be striking without membership support, as they're the people actually on strike, losing pay.

The BA situation is a lot more complex; the employer's attitude and approach has really inflamed hostility between management and staff/employer and employee and it's become a bit of a vicious cycle, as far as I can tell. And because of the involvement of the High Court, much of the rest of the union movement have realised that Unite have to win now, because of the dangerous legal precedents.

Perhaps I wasn't clear - it might well be what Bob Crow wants, but he's not the one making the decisions. His voice holds a lot of sway, of course, but that's not the same.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
A union must run to the benefit of its members, as those members interpret "benefit."

I find it interesting that despite the attacks on business to act in the interest of society and social benefit, the Unions still seem perfectly jolly with the idea of pursuing their own short-term agenda at the expense of, well, everyone else. Despite them campaigning for everyone else to act for social benefit.

Still, the tube network will be fully automated by 2020 and then I won't have to worry about it any more I guess. I think that in ignoring the democratically expressed will of Londoners in their ratification of Bozzers manifesto, the RMT have effectively destroyed themselves, long term.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
Unions equate their membership with the entire working class. We have storming rows internally where another union's negotiating position negatively affects ours, and vice-versa.

Date: 2010-09-28 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Unions equate their membership with the entire working class.

I don't think you realise just how much of a problem this is to the external observer. Most of the working class folk I know (i.e. pretty much everyone from where I grew up) really can't stand the unions now; they're seen as simultaneously working to prop up their own members at the expense of everyone else whilst shouting "We're doing this for everyone!", because it's very obvious that you aren't doing it for everyone.
Speaking from an advertising/marketing perspective, you guys have a shocking perception problem. When former NUM members tell me that they 'can't stand the ******' unions', you've really got your work cut out.

Date: 2010-09-30 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think they've latched onto Scargill still living in a damned nice house they paid for.

I had a think about unions today, and kinda realised that democracy thing needs attention. Surely it's not democratic to call a strike in a workplace, unless a majority of the owrkers want to strike, as opposed to a majority of them who happen to be unionists.

Back when I was a union member, I used the union's services to beat my employers into complying with my contract, which could've been tricky if I'd had to pay the solicitor myself, and that mutual self helpism is very much in keeping with the essence of the labour movement, - but denying someone a say on an action which could close their workplace permanently because they aren't union members is not.

Date: 2010-10-01 08:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
You'd do better posting replies to Joe rather than me, as otherwise he won't see them.

However, speaking personally I find the public sector unions pretensions to democracy laughable and hypocritical. In a democracy, everyone gets one vote on how the public sphere should be administered and run. However, it seems that just by joining their club they feel that not only should get another vote, but also if that vote is disagreed with by the wider demos then they'll go on strike to bully people into accepting their minority view.

Date: 2010-10-01 08:49 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I wasn't too worried if he read it or not. His opinions are ossified by now, and won't change on the mere inconvenience of being wrong.

Date: 2010-09-28 10:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
And, to be precise, I think I have generally been pretty consistent in attacking capitalism rather than capitalists. Your story attacks trade unionists, not trade unionism.

Date: 2010-09-28 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Dude, "Tories hate poor people" has as much (as as little, as you like) basis in accuracy as "Og fear democracy". Only dish it out if you're prepared to take it back, eh?

Date: 2010-09-28 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
That's not a critique of market capitalism. That's a critique of Tory party policy - and one I stand by.

I'm absolutely prepared to take it right back (e.g. "Joe hates rich people" is an inaccurate but not unreasonable rendering of my politics) by that trade unionists fear democracy, one of our core values? That's a different magnitude altogether.

Plus I wasn't aware you were a Tory party member :-p

Date: 2010-09-28 11:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I'm not a member. I simply take it upon myself to defend the weak and defnseless against baseless attacks. I'd do the same if I felt that someone was attacking unions unfairly, although I don't reckon you'll believe that.

To pop back to the Ed Milliband question, in the light of your comment, if the Unions aren't worried about democracy why did the GMB break the leadership election rules to get Ed elected?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/sep/24/ed-miliband-union-gmb-labour-leadership

Date: 2010-09-28 11:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
I hardly feel that the Tory party are weak or defenceless.

The article you link clearly indicates that the GMB broke the spirit but not the letter of the rules* - and it's actually equivocal about whether the spirit was breached. Now, I don't approve of such political gamesmanship** but it's not undemocratic.

*: "The GMB stuck to the guidance: the ballot envelopes were in smaller envelopes, put together and sealed by the Electoral Reform Society – which oversaw the Labour leadership contest – before being delivered to the mailing depot where the GMB also watched over their loading into a larger envelope that was then sent out to members."

**: and in reality, I actually dislike the Labour link for trade unions and wish that union donations, as well as corporate donations and large individual donations, were done away with in favour of state funding for political parties, but that's a whole other thing.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Sorry, I'm just adopting the language of victimhood to lend my arguments some kind of ersatz moral credibility. I feel like Harriet Harman.

I cited the Guardian because I know you won't take seriously any other medium I quote. As it is just about every other news source I've seen is reckoning it was the letter of the rules which was broken, it's just that Guardian is so much the Labour party's Pravda that they'll never say it. I was mildly surprised they even reported it, TBH.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
I'm actually an Indie reader by nature, I don't much like Labour party propaganda.

The GMB clearly read the rules and set about following them in as hollow a way as possible - putting the ballot envelope inside another envelope containing material they couldn't put in the ballot envelope is sneaky and breaks the spirit, but not the letter. But that's no more illegal than tax avoidance or any of that other good stuff.

Date: 2010-09-28 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Yeah, but you were never going to give me the time of day on that one if I quoted the Torygraph at you, were you? It's like you citing the Guardian on economics at me. You'd just laugh!

Date: 2010-09-28 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
The only thing I found about it on the Torygraph website was this blog piece which isn't that compelling - it talks about the top about apparent breaches of the rules, but by the end is back to the same stuff about the spirit.

Date: 2010-09-28 01:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I should have been clear, that was intended as an entertaining example to lighten the mood of the conversation rather than a specific instance.
Let's face it, you wouldn't take me seriously if I said "But it says it in the Torygraph", any more than I do when you pull something out of the Guardian!

Date: 2010-09-28 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
For sure, and I get that - I was rather surprised they hadn't made more of a meal out of it, actually!

Unrelatedly: "my decade-long argument with Joe" terrified the life out of me when I realised that it was true. Dude, WTF?

Date: 2010-09-28 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
All you have to do is stop being wrong and I'll stop arguing with you!

See, easy.

Date: 2010-10-19 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I sometimes wonder why I bother doing satire when real life does it perfectly well for me:

Date: 2010-09-28 11:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] janewilliams20.livejournal.com
If I take it purely as a story, without attempting to link it to current politics, it's well-written and amusing - thanks.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Despite my decade-long argument with Joe which is rattling on above, the only inspiration for the story was a report in the paper which referred to the Unions as 'dinosaurs'. My brain promptly filled in the words 'lost valley of the' and went from there. I wasn't trying to link to recent news the Ed Milliband thing, although I see now that people will make that leap.

Most of the time I'm just after satire.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raggedhalo.livejournal.com
Actually, the dinosaur thing is fair enough. My line manager is actually a velociraptor.

Date: 2010-09-28 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I had been vaguely toying with a sequel entitled "Trades Unionist Park", where the giant Unions of old are recreated in laboratories and it all goes terribly wrong. However, I decided this one was a one-joke idea.

Profile

davywavy: (Default)
davywavy

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 10:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios