davywavy: (toad)
[personal profile] davywavy
I was up bright and early on Sunday morning, which was a wrench as I was also up bright and late on Sunday morning telling smutty stories and filling myself with booze. However, I had a reason for being up and about as such an unaccustomed hour, which was that [livejournal.com profile] medusa_nw had acquired tickets for the last day of the Pre-Raphelite exhibition and they were for 9am.
So it was that I leaped merrily* from my bed, dressed with the speed and grace of a ninja**, joyously greeted*** the new born day, and scampered**** downstairs and out the door. A hop, skip and a jump took me to the tube station and from there it was a short trip to Leicester Square and the national gallery, where I arrived with minutes to spare before 9am.

I've got to say London at that time on a Sunday morning is something I don't see very often and it's very attractive. The chill mist of winter hung lightly over the streets which were near-deserted. Bathed in a cold dawn light, the city had a romantic air. The few passersby seemed to be mostly Chinese tourists with the bemused air of someone wondering just what had made them think that London in January would be a pleasant place to visit. The bells of St Martins bonged out and called the flock to service, and I was so charmed by the chilly solitude of the place I could have stood and taken the scene in for ages. Which was fortunate, as that's what I ended up doing.

As I hurried up to the National Gallery, I noticed a sign on the front reading Dear David. The Pre-Raphaelite exhibition is at the TATE, not the National Gallery. You've come to the wrong place and there's no way you can get to the right place in time to use your ticket, you hopeless imbecile.
P.S
, it added. You are a belmer.

At the very least, I was impressed by how much better signage and communications have become in London in the last few years.

Anyway, so it was that I found myself in central London on an early Sunday morning with little enough to do. I couldn't get to the Tate in time to use the ticket but as the sonorous jangling of church bells rang out over the empty city, an idea struck me. Why not make the most of my mistake and just go off and do something interesting regardless? So off I took myself to morning service at Westminster Abbey.
I've never been into Westminster Abbey, and I've always meant to. I've written an entire section on it in the book***** and I've been past it often enough, but I've always been too tight to fork over a wad of notes to go instead for a poke around. Yes, on the one hand I accept that it's a whopping great big lump of Medieval architecture which is both fragile and old and costs millions a year to stop it falling down, but on the other hand I'm a cheapskate and the best part of fifteen nicker seems a lot when you look at it. However, if you go to service in the Abbey so long as you're wearing the right air of thoughtful piety you just get waved through security, and so in I went.

I like cathedrals; I remember going to evensong at Winchester Cathedral years ago and getting a sense of the numinist experience that a peasant in the 14th century must have had - the choir sits behind screens and so as you walk through the building in the candlelit gloaming there is the sound of plainsong with no indication of where it's coming from. To a pilgrim from the middle ages it must have been a far more remarkable experience than to someone who lives in a society where cathedrals of one sort or another are plentiful and music coming from nowhere isn't exactly remarkable. Westminster Abbey is smaller than some, but it's been the national mausoleum for such a long time that there is barely an inch which isn't a memorial to some worthy or other - Chaucer, Darwin, Dickens, Rutherford, Disraeli, Livingstone, and a veritable kings list of England and Britain are crammed in, sometimes several deep. You can't really take it all in, and it really would take hours to get round it all, so it's a shame that when the service is concluded the Abbey staff grab you by the scruff of the neck and frogmarch you out the back way to stop you looking at the place without paying - especially considering that in a moment of generosity I was so taken with the place and put more in the collection than if I'd just paid at the door and come in with the rest of the rabble.



*staggered cursing
**flailed
***Railed against the awful, awful light of day
****Painfully stubbed my toe
*****Didn't know I'd written one of those? Ah, well, there's a lot you don't know about me. A LOT.

Date: 2013-01-16 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I got "Surface Detail" out of the library. I have to say your experience of the spiritual sounds a lot better than Banks's, which is effectively a sort of everlasting Second Life

H

Date: 2013-01-16 01:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Was it as good as Conrad's Quest for Rubber?

Oh, and did you like London After Dark? It's gloriously lurid, isn't it?

Date: 2013-01-16 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well it certainly shows the London riots, gangs, etc aren't a recent problem, the Teds could be just as vicious.

Actually I thought Fabian of the Yard was a stupendously moral character, obviously well respected by Soho's criminals. And in a way strangely hip - if you google his Desert island Discs choices (1956) he was obviously a fan of the jazz they played in all those nightclubs

H

Date: 2013-01-16 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com
Were the tickets special ones that they wouldn't let you in after nine even if you apologised profusely for getting lost? Because I've not heard about those, although the Tate could have odd rules. Where I work if you miss your timeslot you'll get let in, the tickets just tell you not to, because if everyone who booked for 10 turn up at 2pm then things get a bit awkward.

Date: 2013-01-16 02:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
So when the place you work for puts times on tickets and tells people not to turn up at other times, do you think that maybe from time to time people might believe you?

However, like many things in my anecdotes, I write for effect and so what actually happened might be less entertaining than what I say</> happened.

Date: 2013-01-16 02:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com
They rarely believe us about most things. Why should this be any different.

They regularly ask us to change the time/date because they can't make it (even though it says they're not transferable), and we're quite happy to oblige. They paid money to see the exhibition. Most people expect that that should be honoured. Its not like a concert, as long as the gallery is letting people in, the exhibition isn't sitting backstage congratulating itself and knocking back cans of beer.

Date: 2013-01-16 08:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] medusa-nw.livejournal.com
Yeah, I think any other day that might have been OK, but this was the last day of the exhibition, and there was a massive queue behind us already of people who were going in at 10, let alone at 9... So at the very least I'd have had to go out and queue up again once I'd been around (which turned out to be 2 1/2 hours later anyway, that exhibition was superb, but much bigger than I expected!), and it was sold out so I might not have been able to get back in again despite being a member. Plus there's the fact that when I asked if I could do that they looked at me funny. ;-)

(Just to clarify, I had members tickets for 9, the members-only viewing was between 9 and 10am. After that it was the plebs)

Date: 2013-01-17 12:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com
Ah, that makes sense. We don't bother with timeslots for members, wave your card and in you go- and that goes for the entrance queue too. But then even when its crazy busy (Wildlife Photographer on the opening weekend for example) we don't get the same kind of numbers through the special exhibitions that the Tate would. (Having said our total visitor numbers through the year are about three times Tate Britain, but a bit less than Tate Moderns).

Date: 2013-01-17 10:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] medusa-nw.livejournal.com
Ah, so you work at the NHM? Do you enjoy it? I love that place... :-)

Date: 2013-01-17 10:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com
Sometimes its great, sometimes less so. Half term is hell.

Date: 2013-01-17 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] medusa-nw.livejournal.com
God yes, I can imagine...

Date: 2013-01-16 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] medusa-nw.livejournal.com
Sorry you missed it, though my other friend was very pleased! In any case, as I have a membership, happy to take you as a free +1 to any of the future shows at either Tate to make up for it? Don't know if you like Roy Lichtenstein, that starts in Feb at Tate Modern.

I must check out a service to at some point. I lived behind Westminster Abbey for 3 years in the early 90s and never went there, mainly because the vast number of tourists made me want to take a flame-thrower to them. I think they frown upon that in cathedrals... But I've calmed down a bit over the years.

Date: 2013-01-17 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I don't know ifg I like Roy Leichtenstein either, I've never tried.

I like doing new and different things, but I've found I have an approx 1hr interest in art - I'll start at exhibitions and galleries entranced by stuff, and after an hour I'm walking past old masters muttering "Picture, picture, another friggin' picture", at which point it's time to leave.

Date: 2013-01-17 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] medusa-nw.livejournal.com
At least at Tate Modern they're new masters. ;-)

Profile

davywavy: (Default)
davywavy

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 13th, 2026 04:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios