Tea for two and two for tea.

[davywavy]

For a girl who claims to be very scientifically minded, puddingcat can be just as dogmatic as anyone else when it comes to personal belief. Consider, if you will, the thorny problem of making a cup of tea. She & I have a running disagreement over whether one should put milk in before the hot water, or after.
Being a fellow of taste & refinement I hold to the position of milk in first - reasoning that tea made this way actually tastes nicer. She insists on tea in first, because she prefers nasty tea.
Now Jenny has often said that she can only believe in things that have a scientific basis, and so when I pointed out that the Royal Society of Chemistry have examined in depth the tea making process and come to the scientific conclusion that milk in first is the correct way to make a tasty cuppa, I thought she'd admit to the error of her ways.

Not to be.

Instead she refused to be convinced, and instead said that she'd stick with the tea-making method outlined in the film "Gosford Park".

Now, if I were to tell her that I preferred the depiction of Nuclear Physics in the Keanu Reeves film Chain Reaction to the writings of Enrico Fermi then her wrath and incredulity would be terrible to behold. However, present her with a scientific proof that doesn't happen to fit into her worldview and just watch science being refuted in favour of the movies quicker than you can say 'knife'.


Chicks, eh? Who can fathom them?

Comments

tea

[fire-kitten.livejournal.com]

surely a lot depends how you are making the tea, and the talents fo the person involved.

my personal preference (as someone who is not a naturally gifted tea maker) is milk second as then I can correct for faults in the tea strength.

Possibly you might make a better tea by milk first howerver for the novice milk second will produce a more reliable and predictable quality of tea, and prevent those 'brow dishwater' coloured mugs