Sexuality - or a sandwich.
Aug. 3rd, 2005 10:11 amDuring the bickering which followed one of my recent intemperate rants on these pages, someone used the acronym 'LGBT'. I was fairly confused by this. My immediate reaction was 'What the Hell has a Sandwich got to do with this?" and it took me about 24 hours before I finally figured out, from the context, that 'LGBT' actually stood for 'Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Trans(Gendered? Vestite? I haven't figured the T out yet)' and that it was the latest linguistic ghettoification of a fair swathe of the human race.
There are two sorts of Political Correctness. There's 'not being rude', which is a laudable aim, and there's 'creating tortuous acroynms and euphamisms which, by dint of trying to be all things to all people, simply succeed in belittling the very people they seek to avoid offending'. LGBT is, in my opinion, a fine example of the latter.
You see, when it comes to language and causing offense and hurt with it, it's very often not the words that are used, but the context and intent with which they are used. A good example of this is the Spastics Society, which underwent a lengthy and costly rebranding exercise to 'Scope' (because 'Spastic' is used as an insult), only for kids in playgrounds to be calling each other 'Scopers' within a matter of months.
What really made me think about 'LGBT' was the fact that it's a phrase I've never heard any one of my variously-sexualitied friends use to describe themselves. In short, it's a phrase created by people who don't fit the term to describe a large number of people who they think do. But what do I know? I've never gazed lustfully at another bloke, so I'm not really qualified to comment. However, something I realised when I first really started hanging out with people who wouldn't be classified as a '1' on the Kinsey scale some years ago is that it's only fair and polite to let the people described define the terms used to describe them - within reason, anyway - and I really don't think that 'LGBT' does this.
But like I say. What do I know?
So, in the spirit of exploration and investigation I'd like to ask the non-completely straight people out there: What term would you use to describe your sexuality?
[Poll #544964]
Still, I suppose in a few weeks time, kids in playgrounds up and down the land will be calling "Oh, you're so LGBT!" at each other, and so then Students Unions will have to think of yet another non-judgemental catch all phrases to describe humanity which, whilst being created to avoid any possible offense, will also be just as completely meaningless.
God, when I was at University we actually had to use our time for things like work.*
*
neilhist and
godzuki, you stay out of this.
There are two sorts of Political Correctness. There's 'not being rude', which is a laudable aim, and there's 'creating tortuous acroynms and euphamisms which, by dint of trying to be all things to all people, simply succeed in belittling the very people they seek to avoid offending'. LGBT is, in my opinion, a fine example of the latter.
You see, when it comes to language and causing offense and hurt with it, it's very often not the words that are used, but the context and intent with which they are used. A good example of this is the Spastics Society, which underwent a lengthy and costly rebranding exercise to 'Scope' (because 'Spastic' is used as an insult), only for kids in playgrounds to be calling each other 'Scopers' within a matter of months.
What really made me think about 'LGBT' was the fact that it's a phrase I've never heard any one of my variously-sexualitied friends use to describe themselves. In short, it's a phrase created by people who don't fit the term to describe a large number of people who they think do. But what do I know? I've never gazed lustfully at another bloke, so I'm not really qualified to comment. However, something I realised when I first really started hanging out with people who wouldn't be classified as a '1' on the Kinsey scale some years ago is that it's only fair and polite to let the people described define the terms used to describe them - within reason, anyway - and I really don't think that 'LGBT' does this.
But like I say. What do I know?
So, in the spirit of exploration and investigation I'd like to ask the non-completely straight people out there: What term would you use to describe your sexuality?
[Poll #544964]
Still, I suppose in a few weeks time, kids in playgrounds up and down the land will be calling "Oh, you're so LGBT!" at each other, and so then Students Unions will have to think of yet another non-judgemental catch all phrases to describe humanity which, whilst being created to avoid any possible offense, will also be just as completely meaningless.
God, when I was at University we actually had to use our time for things like work.*
*
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:08 am (UTC)I've not seen it used to identify anyone - I can't see someone saying "I'm LGBT".
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 11:07 am (UTC)I think you'd have to add "...and very busy" if you were claiming all of them.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:09 am (UTC)I've only come across LGBT once which was on a JCR noticeboard which the LGBT rep had control of and would presumably be able to change if desired.
I've never heard LGBT used by anybody to describe themselves but I think that is because it is not valid for an individual but for a group.
The thing that has always slightly amused me is whether there is an entry test for the society in oxford to prove that you are L, G, B or T (I'm similarly confused as you on the meaning of this).
So, there you go.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:11 am (UTC)Ihis was quickly dropped, I think mainly because nobody wanted to create a ghetto.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:17 am (UTC)How, though, *should* we describe an event which is intended for people who are not heterosexual and people who are transgendered or transsexual? 'Queer' is one possible word, but it offends some people and could be seen as excluding trans people.
The reason you have never heard your friends describe themselves as LGBT is that it is not a term which can be applied to an individual. No one person can be described as lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans/gendered/sexual - so your poll is meaningless.
It's a term for describing a community, or a wider group of people, and members of that group do use it and are comfortable with it. You don't have to use it if you don't like it - but good luck coming up with something else.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:21 am (UTC)Discriminatory? :)
What did LGBSoc actually get up to though? I'm trying to work out what the actual point of the society was... RPGSoc roleplays with each other, the rugby society plays rugby, did the LGBSoc just hang around being gay together? I always have it in my mind as a bit of a meat market (not least because of people telling me that it is) because its just a place where you can easily identify those who are gay.
Maybe if I was more gay I'd understand the need for it but I don't really.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:To know you are not alone.
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:26 am (UTC)Hmmmm.
Date: 2005-08-03 10:27 am (UTC)If it did, I might be more bothered. I plan on being married for a long while though.
Re: Hmmmm.
Date: 2005-08-03 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 10:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 11:11 am (UTC)It almost smacks of "well, let's throw trannies in with the mix because they're wierd and freaky too."
Although something like Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Tall...
:)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 12:49 pm (UTC)I.E.
Then some gay paladin turned up and raped us. Gay!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 01:17 pm (UTC)can you tell that I didn't think it was the most positive way to improve people's views about GLBTs?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 01:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-08-03 02:03 pm (UTC)Would it be different if ...
Date: 2005-08-04 02:40 am (UTC)