davywavy: (me.)
[personal profile] davywavy
In the comments to my post the other day, I mentioned that I don't own a TV. This is unusual - figures from the TV licensing people suggest that 99.5% of households in the country have a telly in them and such is the ubiquity of the gogglebox that the Joseph Rountree Foundation uses non-ownership of one as an indicator of poverty (this surprises me, as the people I know who don't own a TV tend to be both better educated and in better jobs than the average).
The are distinct advantages to not owning a TV. I don't run the risk of wasting my time watching witless crap like Eastenders, X-Factor, Big Brother or the new Doctor Who, and anything decent like Life on Mars I can pick up DVDs of at Cash Converters six months after they come out.
What was interesting about my comment was that it pulled out a number of other people on my friends list who don't own TV's. According to the above statistic, only one person in every 200 should be telly-less, and so I should only have one person reading me who doesn't as opposed to several which seems to be the case.

So, to satisfy my curiosity:

[Poll #1070038]
Page 1 of 4 << [1] [2] [3] [4] >>

Date: 2007-10-12 09:08 am (UTC)
drplokta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drplokta
You left out "I own a TV to watch DVDs and play games on, but it's not tuned or connected to an aerial and so I don't have to pay for a license."

Date: 2007-10-12 09:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Nobody's perfect!

Date: 2007-10-12 09:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
I didn't used to watch television.... but then I got hooked on Newsnight.

Date: 2007-10-12 09:35 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have a 14" TV which I don't watch, in order to pay a licence fee which pays for radio 4.

Actually, I have been watching Heroes. It's not very good.

Date: 2007-10-12 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Heroes is kinda like Firefly - a bunch of low-level player character archetypes and the DM's girlfriend's 21st-level, impossibly attractive character have adventures designed to appeal to the geek fraternity.

Date: 2007-10-12 09:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elbly.livejournal.com
Yes you do have to pay for a licence.

If you have had the reciever removed from the TV (which normally costs abotut £150) then you don't have to, but regardless of whether it is tuned in/connected to an aerial/non of the above, if it still has the ability to recieve signals if you did connect and tune then a liecence is required.

This was to close the loop hole for people who had the offical come round from de-tuning and removing the aerial while s/he was distracted.

This also includes Video recorders btw - we do not have a TV but we do have a video recorder, and as such we pay our licence fee. Why he won't take it to the man and have it's bits removed I'll never know!

Date: 2007-10-12 09:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
It's better than Firefly, not nearly as smug and actually funny.

(Ducks and hides from angry nerds.)

Date: 2007-10-12 09:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elbly.livejournal.com
But I'd do the cheerleader given half the chance...

Mmmmmmm! nubile cheerleaders! mmmmmmmmmm!

Date: 2007-10-12 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
I'm not convinced, there's nothing in THE LAW that says that and I had one of their drones confirm it when I actually cared.

Back in the day when we weren't watching television we refused to have the TV detuned. We found the best way to avoid the licensing people was not to answer the door. We did get an exception thingie once.... and shortly had the same threatening letters through the post box.

Their call centre is run by the same group of fuck ups that collect for the London congestion charge.

Date: 2007-10-12 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Neither Firefly nor Heroes do it for me for the same reason that I can't bear to listen to people telling me stories about how incredibly kewl their 23rd level barbarian/bard/ninja is.

Date: 2007-10-12 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
I'm developing ST selective hearing. 'Uh-huh, yeah, sure, uh-huh, another gin you say? Uh-huh, yeah... that sounds nice, submit it in a downtime." The smoking ban came at a great time for those types of things.

Perhaps that filter is making me like Heroes. That or my obsession with laughing at hapless Japanese people. Either way.

Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 09:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Mal Reynolds: 7th Level fighter/theif, party leader.
Jayne: 5th level 1/2-orc fighter.
Book: 4th level cleric
Inara: 4th level illusionist, played by a male gamer.
River Tam: 21st level Ninja/Psionicist, played by the DM's 17-stone girlfriend.

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
My eyes glazed over when I read 'Fi'

I really didn't understand the appeal of Fir-zzzzzz when it was on. Saw the pilot and thought it looked a lot like Crapylon 5, except without G'kar.

Inara: 4th level illusionist, played by a male gamer.

This is true....... :(

Date: 2007-10-12 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elbly.livejournal.com
Oh their call centre are monkeys, no question about it. And yes, you don't have to let the officials in when they come round - they have no warrent and are just pushy bastards, but last time I looked, there was something stipulating that if you had something that could recieve signals you had to cough up. Obviously this might just be well worded and not actually covered by law.

Since we listen to BBC Radio 2 (I'm a TOG and proud of it!) and I watch CSI when there's a new series out, but that's it. Of course I AM addicted to BBC costume dramas - but I buy them on DVD rather than watch them on TV. Mmmmm! Colin Firth in a wet shirt! Mmmmmmm!

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:08 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Jayne is the only character with any appeal, it must be said. I found the cleric particularly unappealing. And the chubby emo cow playing the uber psycho ninja? No wonder the game folded.

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Sorry - Played by a male gamer who has never had a girlfriend.

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:13 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I recall *several people* having characters like that. But no, teh ref wouldn't put up with the ECL14 difference if he wasn't getting something out of the deal, and just how he sold it to the rest of the players is beyond me. Did you read the KODT article on overpowered girlfriend pcs? I have it pdf'd if you want a copy.

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
Or been mildly aware of the concept of female beyond White Wolf sketches?

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
She always whined when she didn't understand an element of the rules and it worked against her. Or if the Doritos and sour cream dip ran out.

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I believe I read that and thought "Boy, I can hear my brother nodding from here."

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:18 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
So me scanning it & hording it for 7 years for this particular moment doesn't horify you? I wasted my time then.

Date: 2007-10-12 10:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
Mmmmm, BBC costume dramas!

They're also claiming if you have a computer or a mobile phone, you have to pay a license fee. Apparently because these devices are capable of receiving a television signal. Uh-huh.

Re: Deconstructing Firefly

Date: 2007-10-12 10:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
You expect me to be horrified by the realisation that you're obsessive? Perhaps I was, twenty years ago.

Ooops - got one wrong:

Date: 2007-10-12 10:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Book: 5th level Assassin/cleric, played by the player who thinks that refusing to talk about his character's mysterious, 30 pages of closely-typed background makes him interesting.

Re: Ooops - got one wrong:

Date: 2007-10-12 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vulgarcriminal.livejournal.com
Something happened 50 years ago that ruined his perception of women and made him a misanthrope. Don't you want to know what that was?! Don't you?!
Page 1 of 4 << [1] [2] [3] [4] >>
Page generated Feb. 26th, 2026 08:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios