So what do you do in the evening, then?
Oct. 12th, 2007 09:27 amIn the comments to my post the other day, I mentioned that I don't own a TV. This is unusual - figures from the TV licensing people suggest that 99.5% of households in the country have a telly in them and such is the ubiquity of the gogglebox that the Joseph Rountree Foundation uses non-ownership of one as an indicator of poverty (this surprises me, as the people I know who don't own a TV tend to be both better educated and in better jobs than the average).
The are distinct advantages to not owning a TV. I don't run the risk of wasting my time watching witless crap like Eastenders, X-Factor, Big Brother or the new Doctor Who, and anything decent like Life on Mars I can pick up DVDs of at Cash Converters six months after they come out.
What was interesting about my comment was that it pulled out a number of other people on my friends list who don't own TV's. According to the above statistic, only one person in every 200 should be telly-less, and so I should only have one person reading me who doesn't as opposed to several which seems to be the case.
So, to satisfy my curiosity:
[Poll #1070038]
The are distinct advantages to not owning a TV. I don't run the risk of wasting my time watching witless crap like Eastenders, X-Factor, Big Brother or the new Doctor Who, and anything decent like Life on Mars I can pick up DVDs of at Cash Converters six months after they come out.
What was interesting about my comment was that it pulled out a number of other people on my friends list who don't own TV's. According to the above statistic, only one person in every 200 should be telly-less, and so I should only have one person reading me who doesn't as opposed to several which seems to be the case.
So, to satisfy my curiosity:
[Poll #1070038]
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:39 am (UTC)(Ducks and hides from angry nerds.)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:44 am (UTC)Perhaps that filter is making me like Heroes. That or my obsession with laughing at hapless Japanese people. Either way.
Deconstructing Firefly
Date: 2007-10-12 09:48 am (UTC)Jayne: 5th level 1/2-orc fighter.
Book: 4th level cleric
Inara: 4th level illusionist, played by a male gamer.
River Tam: 21st level Ninja/Psionicist, played by the DM's 17-stone girlfriend.
Re: Deconstructing Firefly
Date: 2007-10-12 09:50 am (UTC)I really didn't understand the appeal of Fir-zzzzzz when it was on. Saw the pilot and thought it looked a lot like Crapylon 5, except without G'kar.
Inara: 4th level illusionist, played by a male gamer.
This is true....... :(
Re: Deconstructing Firefly
Date: 2007-10-12 10:08 am (UTC)Re: Deconstructing Firefly
Date: 2007-10-12 10:15 am (UTC)Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 10:44 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 11:32 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 12:57 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 12:26 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 12:42 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
Date: 2007-10-12 10:09 am (UTC)Re: Deconstructing Firefly
Date: 2007-10-12 10:13 am (UTC)Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 10:18 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
Date: 2007-10-12 10:46 am (UTC)I just thought it was a complete re-run of Buffy, with some added pseudo-western slang thrown in for good measure. River was Buffy, thus continuing Joss Whedon's strange conviction that if you want a serious combatent, teach a 5'2" tall, 6 stone girl kung fu. Then nothing will stand in her way.
Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:40 am (UTC)Mmmmmmm! nubile cheerleaders! mmmmmmmmmm!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:35 pm (UTC)Flicker, flicker.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:19 pm (UTC)Calling time on this before it goes any further.
Date: 2007-10-12 01:38 pm (UTC)Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 03:00 pm (UTC)Calling time on this before it goes any further.
Date: 2007-10-12 01:38 pm (UTC)Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
Date: 2007-10-12 01:58 pm (UTC)Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 08:55 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From: