So what do you do in the evening, then?
Oct. 12th, 2007 09:27 amIn the comments to my post the other day, I mentioned that I don't own a TV. This is unusual - figures from the TV licensing people suggest that 99.5% of households in the country have a telly in them and such is the ubiquity of the gogglebox that the Joseph Rountree Foundation uses non-ownership of one as an indicator of poverty (this surprises me, as the people I know who don't own a TV tend to be both better educated and in better jobs than the average).
The are distinct advantages to not owning a TV. I don't run the risk of wasting my time watching witless crap like Eastenders, X-Factor, Big Brother or the new Doctor Who, and anything decent like Life on Mars I can pick up DVDs of at Cash Converters six months after they come out.
What was interesting about my comment was that it pulled out a number of other people on my friends list who don't own TV's. According to the above statistic, only one person in every 200 should be telly-less, and so I should only have one person reading me who doesn't as opposed to several which seems to be the case.
So, to satisfy my curiosity:
[Poll #1070038]
The are distinct advantages to not owning a TV. I don't run the risk of wasting my time watching witless crap like Eastenders, X-Factor, Big Brother or the new Doctor Who, and anything decent like Life on Mars I can pick up DVDs of at Cash Converters six months after they come out.
What was interesting about my comment was that it pulled out a number of other people on my friends list who don't own TV's. According to the above statistic, only one person in every 200 should be telly-less, and so I should only have one person reading me who doesn't as opposed to several which seems to be the case.
So, to satisfy my curiosity:
[Poll #1070038]
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:35 am (UTC)Actually, I have been watching Heroes. It's not very good.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:39 am (UTC)(Ducks and hides from angry nerds.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 10:08 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 10:44 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 11:32 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 12:57 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 12:26 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 12:42 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 10:13 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 10:18 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Ooops - got one wrong:
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:Re: Deconstructing Firefly
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:40 am (UTC)Mmmmmmm! nubile cheerleaders! mmmmmmmmmm!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 01:34 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 01:58 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-10-12 08:55 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:Re: Calling time on this before it goes any further.
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:39 am (UTC)If you have had the reciever removed from the TV (which normally costs abotut £150) then you don't have to, but regardless of whether it is tuned in/connected to an aerial/non of the above, if it still has the ability to recieve signals if you did connect and tune then a liecence is required.
This was to close the loop hole for people who had the offical come round from de-tuning and removing the aerial while s/he was distracted.
This also includes Video recorders btw - we do not have a TV but we do have a video recorder, and as such we pay our licence fee. Why he won't take it to the man and have it's bits removed I'll never know!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:41 am (UTC)Back in the day when we weren't watching television we refused to have the TV detuned. We found the best way to avoid the licensing people was not to answer the door. We did get an exception thingie once.... and shortly had the same threatening letters through the post box.
Their call centre is run by the same group of fuck ups that collect for the London congestion charge.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:05 am (UTC)Since we listen to BBC Radio 2 (I'm a TOG and proud of it!) and I watch CSI when there's a new series out, but that's it. Of course I AM addicted to BBC costume dramas - but I buy them on DVD rather than watch them on TV. Mmmmm! Colin Firth in a wet shirt! Mmmmmmm!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:18 am (UTC)They're also claiming if you have a computer or a mobile phone, you have to pay a license fee. Apparently because these devices are capable of receiving a television signal. Uh-huh.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 09:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:43 am (UTC)My overuse of the computer/internet, however, genuinely worries me at times. I think I'd get more intellectual stimulation from the TV, instead of just jacking myself into the little closed gossip circle that is LJ.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 06:43 pm (UTC)Mostly I watch BBC4 and a little BBC2, I suspect I am in the wrong demographic group for most of the content that is available to me....
I often watch in the evening with the sound down after the Green Lady has gone to bed, partly so as not to disturb her and partly because the stories I make up in my head for the images are usually more fun.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 02:18 pm (UTC)