davywavy: (Default)
[personal profile] davywavy
One thing that keeps on coming up about Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials Trilogy is that it contains, apparently, anti-religious sentiment.
I have to say that when I read it this passed me by entirely, but Evangelical Christians in the 'states are burbling in their usual frothing fashion about 'foisting atheism on children', and I've read atheists (seemingly) everywhere rattling on about how they approve of doing just that.
In as far as I can remember from reading the books, the villains are the 'Magisterium', a church who worship a god who turns out just to be the 'first angel' who is pretending to be a god. Now, as far as I remember from reading Paradise Lost, the 'first angel' who pretends to be god is usually referred to as Lucifer, or the Devil.
The reaction to this leaves me slightly boggling. Obviously Pullman's grasp of theology is so poor that he's written a book in which the villains are Satanists whilst thinking he's doing the exact opposite, but what is so depressing is just how many people - atheists and folks of religious bent - he's got to go along with him in this. You'd think that people who feel so strongly about a subject - either positively or negatively - would know a little more about their subject before they started spouting off, wouldn't you?
But then again, this is the internet. Ignorance isn't so much a hindrance as an advantage round here.

Date: 2007-12-04 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sherbetsaucers.livejournal.com
Oh, oh, bags on your coat! (See, that's a biblical reference to thingy, Elish or what ever, picking up the mantle. I'm nto quite as dumb as I look you know)

Date: 2007-12-04 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Elisha!
I suspect that what might have happened is that Elisha thought "Gosh, that's a nice coat" before bopping Elijah on the head and making up a cover story, but who's to say for sure?

Date: 2007-12-04 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sherbetsaucers.livejournal.com
And it's just that kind of thinking that's condeming you to hell.

Date: 2007-12-04 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Have you seen my natty new coat?

Date: 2007-12-04 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sherbetsaucers.livejournal.com
Was that the one I saw you wearing just after I'd noticed that guy and his who football teams worth of brothers staggering around, dazed and confused?

It is a lovely coat mind you.

Date: 2007-12-04 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
I say, what are you doing with that club?

Date: 2007-12-04 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sherbetsaucers.livejournal.com
It's off to Egypt for YOU old son!

(And it's just that kind of thinking that's condeming me to hell.)

Date: 2007-12-04 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
Tsk. A thousand years of bondage until god kills their kids. Here we go again.

Date: 2007-12-04 04:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sherbetsaucers.livejournal.com
You know, a burning bush might have been a nicer way of doing things.

Date: 2007-12-04 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davywavy.livejournal.com
That's your solution to everything.

Date: 2007-12-04 04:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sherbetsaucers.livejournal.com
Where as you're always looking for the frogs. I mean... FROGS!

Profile

davywavy: (Default)
davywavy

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 08:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios