![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Quiz for the day
Jul. 17th, 2002 10:45 amQueen Victoria didn't wear knickers (nor bloomers, nor any other sort of similar underwear).
Why was this?
Why was this?
Jul. 17th, 2002
Handy hint of the day.
Jul. 17th, 2002 01:57 pmWhen creating a Follower of Set, read the FoS clanbook.
Can you find the phrase "As the Followers of Set acheive their goals by subtle manipulation or supplying needs that people don't even realise they have - and much of this strategy relies upon other people trusting them - the clan makes sure to follow an active plan of only embracing morons, fucked up junkies, petty criminals,prostitutes, and dangerous lunatics; these are obviously the sort of people that suspicious members of other clans are going to trust instantly."
You can't find it?
That's because it doesn't say it.
Comprende?
Good.
Can you find the phrase "As the Followers of Set acheive their goals by subtle manipulation or supplying needs that people don't even realise they have - and much of this strategy relies upon other people trusting them - the clan makes sure to follow an active plan of only embracing morons, fucked up junkies, petty criminals,prostitutes, and dangerous lunatics; these are obviously the sort of people that suspicious members of other clans are going to trust instantly."
You can't find it?
That's because it doesn't say it.
Comprende?
Good.
About Vickys undies...
Jul. 17th, 2002 04:28 pmQueen Victoria didn't wear underwear because wearing them would have put fabric between her thighs. Anything which separated a lady's thighs was lewd and immoral, and therefore frowned upon. Many ladies of quality of the era didn't wear knickers for the same reason.
I'm not sure if the 'tied-on' design as described elsewhere developed as a result of this.
I'm not sure if the 'tied-on' design as described elsewhere developed as a result of this.